Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:14:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:14:08 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:29301 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:13:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:12:27 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Hubertus Franke Cc: mingo@elte.hu, Mike Kravetz , Fabio Riccardi , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: a quest for a better scheduler Message-ID: <20010404171227.W20911@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from frankeh@us.ibm.com on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:03:10AM -0400 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:03:10AM -0400, Hubertus Franke wrote: > I understand the dilemma that the Linux scheduler is in, namely satisfy > the low end at all cost. [..] We can satisfy the low end by making the numa scheduler at compile time (that's what I did in my patch at least). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/