Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp351397img; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:35:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxATBAgyoPL0jYHJ6YjbL4B9+uyljVCoUNfFgjAInldhAk1YulJP16+sRCd9MLeCQWcfT/z X-Received: by 2002:a63:2c3:: with SMTP id 186mr1716848pgc.161.1553146548401; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:35:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553146548; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w+4TyZAcjPQbn1fV/lGVnrWyULdg7cuq5+6Nrc2rj6w/fnZJTdP0O6qReoH0NAsXxK W+C0gONdm1XpURZ/Qq1KNIVda2zsgYtVH+sQ62HIjn12rf27VBTfWgOf/5GlRP5zxcRN bAabeblsTG+xFY+q/Ib9YVo95fIrEsvM9qqPPEt3olZQZoLQC5LkmJrG+7mBS0YAdBtM diYkX9sA7Rkn858xuWVQoe5FShJxQzAheu1KKeh7H9jdMhAiepeO9i1/5/o1EQY8RE8J wfDfSUa+7lAuztTkxoaeLju07l/3uD1dgzPpDjTfbLqdzFUDinhQ3hWWEvn9ICPyoaOP ttVw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=HM1IuHNwQPwl3iqKHLvBwfnR/vWdK6wyJec2I42cGOY=; b=FzdeAxgypR/o7CISxjPoOsLDHHPuAbVoLmQz05mPbYcpjXuTGqigqSjHK07Fz1yMdW kGKepcPl5oMRtZPu4K8z4ZAznMhbiKMntUmvI3NCkrkFTi7XnU8QPTemwVE4KvCnrjQW pfekKxX9HMIyJrpm9WUSPOsgCwAIcwt41L4zqMRasbyr/7eFrNhzBBIXFaLNH0L1IwYH l8PsRP3O7/6JaBLF1kpHrmcWAx/lTXI/YY3jBR1Ug3nCNvUqP3hnTYLZ7MLwRCfGXR6d JYCxrG+lK+7XU0Ns4OnxvTU2W5UyWjuwI/yBxmBLLby7Gnk5nNjKSaw2ryfd3Fzaychl Vhbg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 65si3412323pff.260.2019.03.20.22.35.33; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726642AbfCUFdZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 01:33:25 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:50820 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725971AbfCUFdY (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 01:33:24 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE44A78; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.162.42.102] (p8cg001049571a15.blr.arm.com [10.162.42.102]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89A143F71A; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:33:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/isolation: Remove redundant pfn_valid_within() in __first_valid_page() To: Zi Yan Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, osalvador@suse.de, mhocko@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org References: <1553141595-26907-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <8AB57711-48C0-4D95-BC5F-26B266DC3AE8@nvidia.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 11:03:18 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8AB57711-48C0-4D95-BC5F-26B266DC3AE8@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/21/2019 10:31 AM, Zi Yan wrote: > On 20 Mar 2019, at 21:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> pfn_valid_within() calls pfn_valid() when CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE making it >> redundant for both definitions (w/wo CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG) of the helper >> pfn_to_online_page() which either calls pfn_valid() or pfn_valid_within(). >> pfn_valid_within() being 1 when !CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE is irrelevant either >> way. This does not change functionality. >> >> Fixes: 2ce13640b3f4 ("mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages") > > I would not say this patch fixes the commit 2ce13640b3f4 from 2017, > because the pfn_valid_within() in pfn_to_online_page() was introduced by > a recent commit b13bc35193d9e last month. :) Right, will update the tag with this commit.