Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp436796img; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 01:08:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxIwaT3NDcYuK//KA5OHfJ4iiFgrTQxUVP9P4pGpt3U6ki0uRzU/qieWBIGvGYyDkg946C7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b617:: with SMTP id b23mr2156101pls.200.1553155683313; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 01:08:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553155683; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ie83/USJayOxlhXZNiB3IAkMxgdyS6zEaDRTNcgLpml9qtmd/mvWUj5944iYgofz86 RtQR3rzfZ4dft81Pqeidr0lQESx4y5fyiDzUniX5IJTfjUCv6VHAt/1bRhjT+/6UTd4/ 9PipjFiVsAn0J+utY6F7xZvOsdS6PqxnNKWKNFIn23jRs6huJXwBwEi5GnC+i773ELdk ybKNCNYIHydt82Tk3W97cNe42vXmgjSfTDlS2bhRCVEuSmeE5+oqJJpt/sEl9kjwGmL0 ALNSHH8YcmB23LzTvBWS1fJ5Z+rDQFPbARhgG77azMe+PmPvG686YJlYR+UvzMjP2bZ1 Trjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=fbGoxH4umKl3Qxa86TBP5T5qqe0ByZ98JBv0PMF8/2s=; b=CD1l9qNKtjaavKH8T8MGWAgn0d0rx2/Irm1rR+NJlivuOOvS2mvmRhVgewWDVQFOB1 vZM63SRAFP2bnqDDzJI0MmYtNBa/mPo2iPvEFAwGfs39+ctHq3V/7o0ND5Co0pYhrFza nz8BF87ps9ZHnDtYx9pvXgFapXUOQPO5u6d4358z9bNbEJ1a3whBQKLAlyuBsI/ZEIjI zKcAnQnpsq3xLwYjftnUn6cq1fHGGoKmC5V+8yNaFYBqF2oCX4n+9wg+Q/Shg7t2n64w SSe0Z9GmdY9tOQTU2IvNjf+/GSm+BoREqsz3L6OwNPWt945LJ7kSvjedh4d2o7R0AU1O T8fA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s13si3553812pgp.494.2019.03.21.01.07.48; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 01:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727964AbfCUIHF (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 04:07:05 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59686 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727926AbfCUIHF (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 04:07:05 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD88AAC58; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:07:02 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Zi Yan , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, osalvador@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/isolation: Remove redundant pfn_valid_within() in __first_valid_page() Message-ID: <20190321080702.GG8696@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1553141595-26907-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <8AB57711-48C0-4D95-BC5F-26B266DC3AE8@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 21-03-19 11:03:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > On 03/21/2019 10:31 AM, Zi Yan wrote: > > On 20 Mar 2019, at 21:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > >> pfn_valid_within() calls pfn_valid() when CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE making it > >> redundant for both definitions (w/wo CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG) of the helper > >> pfn_to_online_page() which either calls pfn_valid() or pfn_valid_within(). > >> pfn_valid_within() being 1 when !CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE is irrelevant either > >> way. This does not change functionality. > >> > >> Fixes: 2ce13640b3f4 ("mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages") > > > > I would not say this patch fixes the commit 2ce13640b3f4 from 2017, > > because the pfn_valid_within() in pfn_to_online_page() was introduced by > > a recent commit b13bc35193d9e last month. :) > > Right, will update the tag with this commit. The patch is correct but I wouldn't bother to add Fixes tag at all. The current code is obviously not incorrect. Do you see any actual performance issue? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs