Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp669053img; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 06:36:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwozEClQTST6c69uVRFulpBSOdCEPUmpQ/ctxzI2qhExrLJr6c3jX+AClyaDONNuFnGcJSm X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b03:: with SMTP id o3mr3635156plk.126.1553175385122; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 06:36:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553175385; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HxnY2V32bP17l+bdBcgd4uJe2qpVRQueMKo57Ai/zNuyBJ4ac/ckeezfszaN1xDXOW iYQpS9cQzk0X1G0TltHL1bDB95mzVZJ0WRPAl2uXdzRKEgg9lYQ/x5NRdNmf6qaYp7pi RkbgGoxVtOv8irkVU+VuSj3gE8RjJIadaLUEPwdA8GYJ45wH+mNB4MFcv+k5pI9U4dGn hMeJ1AOLeU/X5ccKSlnphYaHNnSwc1Li+ulp/qdHzC5ao8wwxrvLEWGHlX2LXKa/i5BO MEBdHQ+YmXrbUlYVQXL5FLG4IajdmfP5tOKmYqF9R2KM0jlD3zUD9G3on+KRpKcprdSD bEHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=1LJT9RTudIjZ8CXunABmJfjl7Yfp/STUcmmqHx9g9Lo=; b=Kb4qVMJpjBHrfap39wuJwNr66WT/COISggr8YGZIGXKpduWiZ/iv241c9pd2DyRJOh xgRJ7Myvq63pHa81+gDgeX+/Ew/U48uCUhLAGLInH2rcR+16tz29/RhHpeI+EzcOOY+j wAOpiiZ1fqdQJuzVPRzZ9h1yM6fz/ehyn/RJI3DGqj5P7nYTNCGN1m8KgY40oTT2tc/j gdJlAgsLx88J3Sjd3u+z9zi4r1t6nhl/1u6NN2tX77VmIZctiXeLKr2qFUmRgl32QPlh qUYwbifEchwXRmUrEK9F+XSo+mPnik+utTaISeb76a+UxUtVid9O0E/3IHj5xBYXwJ7W DK3A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m90si4119581pfj.271.2019.03.21.06.36.09; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 06:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728377AbfCUNfE (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:35:04 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:56080 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728069AbfCUNfD (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:35:03 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214DE80D; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 06:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.45] (e112298-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.45]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 705A63F71A; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 06:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Change PMCR write to read-modify-write To: Prasad Sodagudi , will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1553134066-20272-1-git-send-email-psodagud@codeaurora.org> From: Julien Thierry Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:34:55 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1553134066-20272-1-git-send-email-psodagud@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Prasad, On 21/03/2019 02:07, Prasad Sodagudi wrote: > Preserves the bitfields of PMCR_EL0(AArch64) during PMU reset. > Reset routine should write a 1 to PMCR.C and PMCR.P fields only > to reset the counters. Other fields should not be changed > as they could be set before PMU initialization and their > value must be preserved even after reset. > Are there any particular bit you are concerned about? Apart from the RO ones and the Res0 ones (to which we are already writing 0), I see: DP -> irrelevant for non-secure X -> This one is the only potentially interesting, however it resets to an architecturally unknown value, so unless we know for a fact it was set before hand, we probably want to clear it D -> ignored when we have LC set (and we do) E -> Since this is the function we use to reset the PMU on the current CPU, we probably want to set this bit to 0 regardless of its previous value So, is there any issue this patch is solving? Thanks, > Signed-off-by: Prasad Sodagudi > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c > index 4addb38..0c1afdd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c > @@ -868,8 +868,8 @@ static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info) > * Initialize & Reset PMNC. Request overflow interrupt for > * 64 bit cycle counter but cheat in armv8pmu_write_counter(). > */ > - armv8pmu_pmcr_write(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_C | > - ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC); > + armv8pmu_pmcr_write(armv8pmu_pmcr_read() | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P | > + ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_C | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC); > } > > static int __armv8_pmuv3_map_event(struct perf_event *event, > -- Julien Thierry