Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp683424img; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 06:55:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyqNDv+ExmHnFDoGA8fsvspkYpmW8+n4fwchKtpqjl/0BT/VwZxT3hnEHyjL2cHH9DAHFs X-Received: by 2002:a62:788e:: with SMTP id t136mr3345978pfc.249.1553176539503; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 06:55:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553176539; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=piy6KmwhhevLwph0vNNeLSIubltCW24nsw0AFw2LUMuegCZajaoteqwhJCXzGwntoc 4hI84SbtQjL9b76Ke09x0Nlg7FA/VwcY0meOeT7GYCbmuPK5m11ESsyHiNb+sKUsTyf2 2WcuQstDaTY5VhWLBsHg1ZpaCNkq1DaCD+r7/p6HrqhD3EMbf/+dNGXrYYIfg3C9Ldvp AsvFtK6dSNgWopb9kd4DuLCe1tqc72SfAGcr037aoNo8o57G7ANMSoq9ZSCjpK3mzBP9 b8hJYzPs/heQPfrcxb519cjdRG31VNRG8n/jkn0BTm4ViJyjFg9jNj5Rbgxkq11EGcHw HsPw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=5KAiJjEzb7DC0R8E/86LkVB4kb0IhYwa7J9ykk4Mj6A=; b=OgDG8Jnze+5TqkLMX413kAD6bgcMMbgBzK1CfcHnetpaCzlbnuXVUMn8oDRNidR7bW a2Y1bCEr06j/7Sni6cwlR1GnQyCR0WgOE27J1BShPTkv0NELRd/VQNLrAdUSMvm2Ypoh a1bxlCnmDi3Dw8YGB5636RCPnpi6nPUhGD0CWRBz9/yeQZSSooGL/DjK8MWBxwh3qZqN TaW/JjLZ4KEw8nmbhYp92JOSW3XkviaozYrMuMlrXE1U00MtiKNoZzrcqWUUp7yb572E bP/dUxToyTD5EY0YEbq0NgoMOCKzWNQJ4VFATSaUi6jFvyri02L68ynCIjYLGtpLSf1D 6gqA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x3si4315145plv.424.2019.03.21.06.55.22; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 06:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728174AbfCUNye (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:54:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56348 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725985AbfCUNye (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:54:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD7913082E0F; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.116.167] (ovpn-116-167.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.167]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6CD619C59; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/22] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API To: Jean-Philippe Brucker , Jacob Pan Cc: yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, vincent.stehle@arm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, eric.auger.pro@gmail.com References: <20190317172232.1068-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190317172232.1068-6-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190320093727.45a86866@jacob-builder> <7ae1df77-18d0-0993-8dab-6af3a4474b42@arm.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:54:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7ae1df77-18d0-0993-8dab-6af3a4474b42@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.46]); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jacob, Jean-Philippe, On 3/20/19 5:50 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On 20/03/2019 16:37, Jacob Pan wrote: > [...] >>> +struct iommu_inv_addr_info { >>> +#define IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_PASID (1 << 0) >>> +#define IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_ARCHID (1 << 1) >>> +#define IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_LEAF (1 << 2) >>> + __u32 flags; >>> + __u32 archid; >>> + __u64 pasid; >>> + __u64 addr; >>> + __u64 granule_size; >>> + __u64 nb_granules; >>> +}; >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * First level/stage invalidation information >>> + * @cache: bitfield that allows to select which caches to invalidate >>> + * @granularity: defines the lowest granularity used for the >>> invalidation: >>> + * domain > pasid > addr >>> + * >>> + * Not all the combinations of cache/granularity make sense: >>> + * >>> + * type | DEV_IOTLB | IOTLB | PASID | >>> + * granularity | | | >>> cache | >>> + * -------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+ >>> + * DOMAIN | N/A | Y | >>> Y | >>> + * PASID | Y | Y | >>> Y | >>> + * ADDR | Y | Y | >>> N/A | >>> + */ >>> +struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info { >>> +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE_INFO_VERSION_1 1 >>> + __u32 version; >>> +/* IOMMU paging structure cache */ >>> +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_IOTLB (1 << 0) /* IOMMU IOTLB */ >>> +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_DEV_IOTLB (1 << 1) /* Device >>> IOTLB */ +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_PASID (1 << 2) /* PASID >>> cache */ >> Just a clarification, this used to be an enum. You do intend to issue a >> single invalidation request on multiple cache types? Perhaps for >> virtio-IOMMU? I only see a single cache type in your patch #14. For VT-d >> we plan to issue one cache type at a time for now. So this format works >> for us. > > Yes for virtio-iommu I'd like as little overhead as possible, which > means a single invalidation message to hit both IOTLB and ATC at once, > and the ability to specify multiple pages with @nb_granules. The original request/explanation from Jean-Philippe can be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/28/1497 > >> However, if multiple cache types are issued in a single invalidation. >> They must share a single granularity, not all combinations are valid. >> e.g. dev IOTLB does not support domain granularity. Just a reminder, >> not an issue. Driver could filter out invalid combinations. Sure I will add a comment about this restriction. > > Agreed. Even the core could filter out invalid combinations based on the > table above: IOTLB and domain granularity are N/A. I don't get this sentence. What about vtd IOTLB domain-selective invalidation: " • IOTLB entries caching mappings associated with the specified domain-id are invalidated. • Paging-structure-cache entries caching mappings associated with the specified domain-id are invalidated. " Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > Jean > >> >>> + __u8 cache; >>> + __u8 granularity; >>> + __u8 padding[2]; >>> + union { >>> + __u64 pasid; >>> + struct iommu_inv_addr_info addr_info; >>> + }; >>> +}; >>> + >>> + >>> #endif /* _UAPI_IOMMU_H */ >> >> [Jacob Pan] >> _______________________________________________ >> iommu mailing list >> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu >> >