Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263732AbUCXOwD (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:52:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263734AbUCXOwD (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:52:03 -0500 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:11151 "EHLO dualathlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263732AbUCXOwA (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:52:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:52:53 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Takashi Iwai Cc: William Lee Irwin III , Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , mjy@geizhals.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads Message-ID: <20040324145253.GG2065@dualathlon.random> References: <40591EC1.1060204@geizhals.at> <20040318060358.GC29530@dualathlon.random> <20040318015004.227fddfb.akpm@osdl.org> <20040318145129.GA2246@dualathlon.random> <405A584B.40601@cyberone.com.au> <20040319050948.GN2045@holomorphy.com> <20040320121423.GA9009@dualathlon.random> <20040320145111.GD2045@holomorphy.com> <20040320150311.GN9009@dualathlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 CC A0 71 81 F4 A0 63 AC C0 4B 81 1D 8C 15 C8 E5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1678 Lines: 37 On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:57:20PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:03:11 +0100, > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:51:11AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > > I may have missed one of his posts where he gave the results from the > > > RT test suite. I found a list of functions with some kind of numbers, > > > though I didn't see a description of what those numbers were and was > > > looking for something more detailed (e.g. the output of the RT > > > instrumentation things he had with and without preempt). This is all > > > mostly curiosity and sort of hoping this gets carried out vaguely > > > scientifically anyway, so I'm not really arguing one way or the other. > > > > agreed. what I've seen so far is a great number of graphs, they were > > scientific enough for my needs and covering real life different > > workloads, but I'm not sure what Takashi published exactly, you may want > > to discuss it with him. > > sorry, there is no exact descrption (yet) in public, except for the > pdf of slides i presented ago: > > http://www.alsa-project.org/~iwai/audio-latency.pdf this is what I meant. To be fair I've also seen lots of raw input data, but you represented all the interesting points in the presentation. > it uses its own kernel module to generate irqs from RTC and to trace > stacks. > > i'll show the results of the recent kernels tomorrow... cool ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/