From: Jos Hulzink <josh@stack.nl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Subject: Re: OSS: cleanup or throw away
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:02:40 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <200403221955.52767.jos@hulzink.net> <20040322215709.GT16746@fs.tum.de>
In-Reply-To: <20040322215709.GT16746@fs.tum.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200403241802.40834.josh@stack.nl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 780
Lines: 19

On Monday 22 March 2004 22:57, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> OSS will stay in 2.6 (2.6 is a stable kernel series) but it will most
> likely be removed in 2.7.
>
> I wouldn't spend time to fix deprecated warnings in OSS code, such
> cleanups are wasted time for code that will most likely be removed in
> 2.7.

Fair, but as I am not yet ready for the big work, this might be a nice 
exercise to find my way trough the kernel, to commit patches, etc. So I might 
spend a few weekends to it, albeit mostly to get nicer compile statistics :)

Jos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/