Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 094/134] Its wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice
Date:   Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:15:07 +0100
Message-Id: <20190322111216.957712563@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190322111210.465931067@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20190322111210.465931067@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>

commit b761dcf1217760a42f7897c31dcb649f59b2333e upstream.

In reshape_request it already adds len to sector_nr already. It's wrong to add len to
sector_nr again after adding pages to bio. If there is bad block it can't copy one chunk
at a time, it needs to goto read_more. Now the sector_nr is wrong. It can cause data
corruption.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.16+
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/raid10.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -4528,7 +4528,6 @@ bio_full:
 	atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
 	read_bio->bi_next = NULL;
 	generic_make_request(read_bio);
-	sector_nr += nr_sectors;
 	sectors_done += nr_sectors;
 	if (sector_nr <= last)
 		goto read_more;