Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp593098img; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:45:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx1VhJjYWwh8nu9xPSlboa58jAm5POkNfdlF0Hh/RzGdgSac3qv3qe4XE6PvyYT2jt4Ecct X-Received: by 2002:a62:5142:: with SMTP id f63mr8788996pfb.57.1553255146895; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:45:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553255146; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=anG1YvB76Binb8FT46G7TuUWKENKRkYjS7NyVuSThxUvmIFGkkebUM9mOku+kfCnTk vw9l6wAPa3HN0LRLySMNIe2R7LIlObfKOkg5Oca2daRRBKcLFITO0fsKr2wojeGBNfgc 0S1sdcUCx0dLSFB0uIxwdNGKDdUx+t5ryytXmGuJCMQdkjDQqy8kDpKUJJ/sEmjf8Mx6 eg18H5qLlcjEswmZx96TogUuRt1UJ4K8FVi2Q3f0RaBVhkG/I5b476H+XT3GfTL3D9hV rAk2gnsNjg1M3ZetcK485kZbvGHPxVegVo1pGoLqvz1Cddjmv4qHFXlieIFsALkGHgxn cDtA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=XOPs94bpNLL+Yz3EooYQK766n94CJ6JaZRrnstHtldA=; b=ye5KZQ+h5HAbgg5LXKuNZrSTIL7FZJL1xKN7deajTtuy+8G7G3Rx9ZND6FZhZLDgFS gshs1j5/XGrvfd/wmOWwnuq6NCNyFQQ9C0E924edOv4KGu7yeejdMYTTzE0ynAN2giyt d6wcZND70uE/6Q2efqEL42Fu8Le32I8zaw7T0R4QGOvy8dFsGUHNRdkGU1wwJooSlHSw wWmrl2deGX2qO/6LowMZa8fuxIrFi61TFtPOdRZYrzs6U1zwmLwHTQpzZSWtOkut28kM J7sD4660dffDUaV1wLAd1lmo2aUx17A91UH58NgWNuOCJkQ7wJKYW4A7YRm+7ANV4i8b lkTg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=KQc+NRes; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s61si7131272plb.305.2019.03.22.04.45.31; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=KQc+NRes; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730839AbfCVLnj (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:43:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46300 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731680AbfCVLnd (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:43:33 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA20F21916; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:43:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553255013; bh=gGAN9i2pgt4vpnoUqQw1a/e7rsNODKJhoGSeFds19Xo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KQc+NResV4Pg5Zd1P+DRmw4wYu0IKtbD5AaoBXOXDN5ZKg7w2Xs55HJEFUZTheBGm qKMKITDu5RwwVbytpfE02B6wVmsnIZc/WUM/RM9l1WcNx78x/+99Bvnlkcf+u2hvB/ 3BOyhqAyx5FvJBu6aZiOtZRJBsLiGqnw1YWlVXsQ= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 4.9 062/118] scsi: target/iscsi: Avoid iscsit_release_commands_from_conn() deadlock Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:15:34 +0100 Message-Id: <20190322111221.055884074@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190322111215.873964544@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190322111215.873964544@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Bart Van Assche commit 32e36bfbcf31452a854263e7c7f32fbefc4b44d8 upstream. When using SCSI passthrough in combination with the iSCSI target driver then cmd->t_state_lock may be obtained from interrupt context. Hence, all code that obtains cmd->t_state_lock from thread context must disable interrupts first. This patch avoids that lockdep reports the following: WARNING: inconsistent lock state 4.18.0-dbg+ #1 Not tainted -------------------------------- inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage. iscsi_ttx/1800 [HC1[1]:SC0[2]:HE0:SE0] takes: 000000006e7b0ceb (&(&cmd->t_state_lock)->rlock){?...}, at: target_complete_cmd+0x47/0x2c0 [target_core_mod] {HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: lock_acquire+0xd2/0x260 _raw_spin_lock+0x32/0x50 iscsit_close_connection+0x97e/0x1020 [iscsi_target_mod] iscsit_take_action_for_connection_exit+0x108/0x200 [iscsi_target_mod] iscsi_target_rx_thread+0x180/0x190 [iscsi_target_mod] kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 irq event stamp: 1281 hardirqs last enabled at (1279): [] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa9/0x160 hardirqs last disabled at (1281): [] interrupt_entry+0xb5/0xd0 softirqs last enabled at (1278): [] lock_sock_nested+0x51/0xc0 softirqs last disabled at (1280): [] ip6_finish_output2+0x124/0xe40 [ipv6] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(&cmd->t_state_lock)->rlock); lock(&(&cmd->t_state_lock)->rlock); --- drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c @@ -4084,9 +4084,9 @@ static void iscsit_release_commands_from struct se_cmd *se_cmd = &cmd->se_cmd; if (se_cmd->se_tfo != NULL) { - spin_lock(&se_cmd->t_state_lock); + spin_lock_irq(&se_cmd->t_state_lock); se_cmd->transport_state |= CMD_T_FABRIC_STOP; - spin_unlock(&se_cmd->t_state_lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&se_cmd->t_state_lock); } } spin_unlock_bh(&conn->cmd_lock);