Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263129AbUCYCV7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:21:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263124AbUCYCV7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:21:59 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:45459 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263123AbUCYCV4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:21:56 -0500 Message-ID: <40624235.30108@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:21:41 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Brown CC: "Justin T. Gibbs" , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: "Enhanced" MD code avaible for review References: <760890000.1079727553@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <16479.50592.944904.708098@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <2128160000.1080023015@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <16480.61927.863086.637055@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <16480.61927.863086.637055@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1342 Lines: 35 Neil Brown wrote: > Choice is good. Competition is good. I would not try to interfere > with you creating a new "emd" driver that didn't interfere with "md". > What Linus would think of it I really don't know. It is certainly not > impossible that he would accept it. Agreed. Independent DM efforts have already started supporting MD raid0/1 metadata from what I understand, though these efforts don't seem to post to linux-kernel or linux-raid much at all. :/ > However I'm not sure that having three separate device-array systems > (dm, md, emd) is actually a good idea. It would probably be really > good to unite md and dm somehow, but no-one seems really keen on > actually doing the work. I would be disappointed if all the work that has gone into the MD driver is simply obsoleted by new DM targets. Particularly RAID 1/5/6. You pretty much echoed my sentiments exactly... ideally md and dm can be bound much more tightly to each other. For example, convert md's raid[0156].c into device mapper targets... but indeed, nobody has stepped up to do that so far. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/