Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:46:10 -0500
From:   Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
To:     Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
CC:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: musb: Support gadget mode when the port is set to
 dual role
Message-ID: <20190322134610.GG25852@uda0271908>
Mail-Followup-To: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>,
        Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
References: <1522324644.1746.19.camel@bootlin.com>
 <20180420142524.GB29011@uda0271908>
 <2db056d6f65ecbcdc4f31a37fe2e1b1ddfb93c87.camel@paulk.fr>
 <20180421143426.GA10632@LTA0271908.dhcp.ti.com>
 <20190321130133.zllt5pqbrhiecoch@flea>
 <20190321164138.GB11121@kroah.com>
 <20190322124622.GB25852@uda0271908>
 <8a5e34c5f24d63a7735ae86ccd340f6b5f66959d.camel@bootlin.com>
 <20190322133608.GE25852@uda0271908>
 <8bc814b508ef86214a9913b4fdb9c13681934a7b.camel@bootlin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8bc814b508ef86214a9913b4fdb9c13681934a7b.camel@bootlin.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 02:37:24PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > 
> > > > To summaries my comments on this again, since it is minor in my opinion,
> > > > I won't spend time to solve it myself (in a near future), but I am more
> > > > than happy to review and take any patch which solve it. 
> > > 
> > > It is definitely very much appreciated that you are open to accepting a
> > > fix for this issue even though you consider it a non-issue :)
> > 
> > I believe in previous discussion I have expressed I am open to a
> > solution ;)
> 
> Indeed, you were always open to seeing the issue solved :)
> 
> > but I don't consider "it is a non-issue", it is minor in my opinion,
> > then I don't have time to solve it myself.
> 
> Right, sorry for over-stating this!

No worries at all.

-Bin.