Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:48:15 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
       Rick Lindsley <ricklind@us.ibm.com>, piggin@cyberone.com.au,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, kernel@kolivas.org,
       rusty@rustcorp.com.au, anton@samba.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3
Message-ID: <20040325214815.GA19060@elte.hu>
References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D372001730111990F@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com> <20040325154011.GB30175@wotan.suse.de> <20040325190944.GB12383@elte.hu> <10030000.1080242684@flay>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <10030000.1080242684@flay>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 535
Lines: 16


* Martin J. Bligh <mbligh@aracnet.com> wrote:

> Exec time balancing is a *lot* more efficient, it just doesn't work
> for things that don't exec ... cloned threads would certainly be one
> case.

yeah - exec-balancing is a clear thing. fork/clone time balancing is
alot less clear.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/