Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:15:09 +0800
From:   Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To:     Boris Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
        "fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com" <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        "bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>, "bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>,
        "kasong@redhat.com" <kasong@redhat.com>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided
Message-ID: <20190325101509.GA13160@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
References: <20190322110342.GA16202@jeru.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
 <20190322152328.GD12472@zn.tnic>
 <20190325002740.GA6637@jeru.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
 <20190325060128.GB9385@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
 <20190325061929.GC9385@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
 <bcb5bd29-a3b8-e42d-8da7-a8501f695c21@ce.jp.nec.com>
 <20190325065921.GA11096@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
 <20190325082720.GA20771@jeru.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
 <51D9A7D1-49BF-4679-B102-0FC5AC300C9F@alien8.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51D9A7D1-49BF-4679-B102-0FC5AC300C9F@alien8.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03/25/19 at 09:54am, Boris Petkov wrote:
> On March 25, 2019 9:27:21 AM GMT+01:00, Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> >On 3/25/19 3:59 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >> On 03/25/19 at 06:47am, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> >>> On 3/25/19 3:19 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >>>> On 03/25/19 at 02:01pm, Dave Young wrote:
> >>>> I think normally people do not see this bug, because kernel will
> >set the
> >>>> rsdp in boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr.  Maybe you are testing with
> >>>
> >>> I think it's only done for file-based kexec interface.
> >> 
> >> Saw Kairui's another reply, yes, kexec-tools need a patch to fill the
> >> value as well then.
> >> 
> >> I would vote for a repost of your old patch with some #ifdef
> >
> >Thanks for comments, Dave, Kairui and Baoquan.
> >
> >The problem for me is it's a regression in v5.1-rc1, that breaks
> >existing setup. If early parsing of RSDP is required only for newly
> >supported configuration, I'm fine such configuration requires
> >new tools or new options.
> >
> >This is the 1st version plus #ifdef around the EFI code.
> 
> I'm going to repeat that again until you get it:
> 
> If the kexec kernel should continue to use efi_systab_init() then you
> should make efi_get_rsdp_addr() exit early in the kexec-ed kernel.

In that way, early parsing will fail in kexeced kernel, am I missing
something?  The early code become complicated but since we have already
the early acpi parsing why not to make it consistent in kexeced kernel?

Thanks
Dave