Received-SPF: temperror (google.com: error in processing during lookup of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org: DNS error) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:22:06 +0200
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/28] thunderbolt: Add support for full PCIe daisy
 chains
Message-ID: <20190325112206.GH3622@lahna.fi.intel.com>
References: <20190206131738.43696-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <20190206131738.43696-18-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <20190324113144.wubme46hby7rj6r2@wunner.de>
 <20190325095733.GC3622@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <20190325111616.gjfkos666gz3blj2@wunner.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190325111616.gjfkos666gz3blj2@wunner.de>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:16:16PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Yes, but my point is that it doesn't make much sense to establish a tunnel
> between a switch and one of its parent switches unless that parent switch
> is reachable from the root switch over a PCI tunnel or a series of PCI
> tunnels.
>
> It may be worth checking that condition, or, if new tunnels are established
> top-down in the daisy-chain and tunnel establishment has failed for a
> switch, to not establish tunnels for switches beyond that one.

OK, got it :)