Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp3176691img; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 05:27:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQ1WEHYlMJSOeEyyV2Ni7BuDP5r0gT0GqKSixG+xeXDIskeRbOxZT19ABRKczK1n9+eHyg X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b418:: with SMTP id x24mr18522859plr.323.1553516845826; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 05:27:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553516845; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wcwqfKcYpZEgsYiBFVntRDGcpSoLQG420Q+Ia9bmuoK3EQtZas11Wziz5aHxznYhGu QJOdovLzXNfoHnzRFCQO2SKG8JsITOehiC3DqodiVKLB834kWiEclQKFVSnYuYqpFgUP Ng/5rW0rIg067Q+fEM/VmqDjzeuYTK34qzEn6EFDa1iPYSrdJ4xbwA4GmpqY0FQUcEGC 3Op/r5PfzQSs8pwpcA+RF615KUqfJl80CKsBL8kglCV/CFASGivcoaDDHxV3cj0GE31F R1tvUNaWCOIU5HXXAH+JeQgvimiQ0xdKTRpIQxEnnU0tUrxfC7689u7Q/xS2fZ0myFpE VkzA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=RJkXzSNKhFR++UEQIi0Bg19oesfGxC1NYndoECMtewQ=; b=P8m3WpiH5f5rxdWqgphebUxY1jGWsL7dO6VSuwERe8ZxBPQSiiiKTB9x39/R/9zbAU yhxtDycMYgs6PB6aRLZd0Xx01TZgrd1NcRxdTX7AHC6HnuavcYbhmQMIENCPmpdfQ7Mi Nr7y5O5+abR7ZlwWb6WFgYaLzFDPAurSV7+73ub2s7jhLiLvRnZf0GPGmqv8yeF5VW7g 0JY9ffn5ABmVTdg3NcJS0dnnLrBMYB/uHg3gCM0zkS81Gf/MUx+s0/5OClxFcGAmJC17 C/+QdZpxyxVdFAyKr0pQOHtNcCUoy6bfDMnESCB9fo2WawnbepFRffDXzbIZYcbGdmOi yXFg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n30si9570735pgl.264.2019.03.25.05.27.10; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 05:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731179AbfCYMZ0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:25:26 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]:52212 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730996AbfCYMZZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:25:25 -0400 Received: from [94.134.91.136] (helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h8OfJ-0006lc-8k; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:25:21 +0100 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Douglas Anderson Cc: mka@chromium.org, ryandcase@chromium.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Tomeu Vizoso , Alexis Ballier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Robin Murphy , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Akash Gajjar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: dts: rockchip: Add rk3288-veyron-jerry rev 10-15 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:25:20 +0100 Message-ID: <22847786.E0k6fS2MZ4@phil> In-Reply-To: <20190322195924.70448-1-dianders@chromium.org> References: <20190322195924.70448-1-dianders@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 22. M?rz 2019, 20:59:23 CET schrieb Douglas Anderson: > As far as I can tell/remember rev10 was originally created to support > making a SKU of jerry that had a different LCD. rev11-rev15 were > added to give some wiggle room for future builds. Downstream has a > separate device tree for rev10-rev15 (compared to rev3-rev7) with the > expectation that differences relating to the LCD would be accounted > for there but nothing was ever added to the rev10-rev15 making it > identical to the rev3-rev7 one. > > It's likely nothing actually shipped with rev10-rev15 but they are > listed in the downstream kernel's device tree and it seems like it > should add a little safety if we match them here just in case > something actually shipped with one of these revisions and that device > will break if we don't claim support. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson applied both for 5.2 Thanks Heiko