Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264008AbUCZKui (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 05:50:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264012AbUCZKui (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 05:50:38 -0500 Received: from gprs214-227.eurotel.cz ([160.218.214.227]:57473 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264008AbUCZKuf (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 05:50:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:50:23 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Michael Frank Cc: Nigel Cunningham , Suspend development list , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Message-ID: <20040326105023.GA360@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20040323233228.GK364@elf.ucw.cz> <20040325014107.GB6094@elf.ucw.cz> <200403250857.08920.matthias.wieser@hiasl.net> <1080247142.6679.3.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au> <20040325222745.GE2179@elf.ucw.cz> <1080250718.6674.35.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au> <20040325225453.GH2179@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2029 Lines: 72 Hi! > >> > only "non compressed" part to reach mainline for 2.6. Feature freeze > >> > was few months ago, and "adding possibility to compress swsusp data" > >> > does not sound like a bugfix to me... > >> > >> Feature freeze is always half unfrozen anyway. 2.4 just gained XFS! > >> I'm > > > > XFS probably has 10+ people working on it, full time, and it still > > required quite a lot of pushing. > > We could push harder. Should we ask all swsusp2 users using > compression to announce themselves on LKML? ;) Hmm, I've one such troll announcing into my inbox, sending stuff like below. I hope he's the only one. Subject: Microsoft RULES!!! To: Pavel Machek ... So stop spreading nonsense about "NO COMPROMISES" and stop comparing me to Mickey$oft. Thanks. --------------------- Such a CUNT!!! Microsoft do very well engineered software, something Linux can't sadly achive in ages if still emply LOOSERS LIKE U. When a Microsoft engineer see a people like u, simply laugh!!! U MORON. U ARE SUCH A STUPID CUNT, NOW ALL THE LIST KNOW ABOUT U, WE ALL LAUGHT! and > So swsusp2 does _not_ fail. You still have a usable system instead of a > paniced system you seem to like to accept. If swsusp1 panics system, that's a bug. I'm not accepting that one. Refusing to suspend (I'd call it "fail to suspend") is bad but is not a bug. Do we understand each other now? ------------- U know, I used to call u your name this days: STUPID, IDIOT, MORON, but that's not enough. Your last sentence related with your CRAPPY, LURID, DANGEROUS swsusp1 qualify u as what u are. A WORST GEEK, A LOOSER, A STUPID CUNT: U WONT EVER ADMIT YOUR PROGRAM CRASH AND THAT IS A BUG :-(((( -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/