Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:54:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:54:20 -0400 Received: from mail11.speakeasy.net ([216.254.0.211]:55057 "HELO mail11.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:54:17 -0400 Message-ID: <3ACB6DEB.4020709@megapathdsl.net> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 11:54:35 -0700 From: Miles Lane User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-ac2 i686; en-US; 0.8.1) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Dodd CC: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brownell Subject: Re: Contacts within AMD? AMD-756 USB host-controller blacklisted due to In-Reply-To: <3ACB7216.9F12D286@cypress.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Dodd wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >>> David Brownell recently added this check to the usb-ohci driver >>> since noone has gotten information from AMD for the workaround, >>> which is rumored to exist, for this bug. >>> >>> Do any of you have contacts within AMD who might be able to >>> get an explanation of the workaround to David Brownell? >> >> We are working on that currently via the Red Hat contact. >> >> >>> value given varies. Rereading NDP seems to give a valid value. >>> I am not really clear why we don't simply read the value twice >>> whenever the host-controller is detected to be an AMD-756. >> >> because we dont know the full scope of the problem yet. > > > Exactly how many bug reports has this caused? > What kind of problems? > > I know I had trouble onece, but it was a CONFIG problem > with the 2.4.2ac series and the extra DEBUG options. I think probably everyone who has an AMD-756 has reported this error. At least, I've not seen any messages from people saying, "I have an AMD-756 and have never seen this error." Most of the time, when the error occurs, it seems pretty benign. That is, I haven't noticed it crashing USB device connections, causing data corruption or OOPSen. Some folks _have_ reported OOPSen, though, that seemed to be triggered by the erratum #4 hardware bug. I think I may have had one of these a long time ago. I believe David has found that there definitely are code paths where this hardware bug can cause failures of various sorts and that's why the AMD-756 has been blacklisted. I don't believe these failure code paths have anything to do with specific debugging configurations. David/Alan, please correct me if I've got this all wrong. Thanks, Miles - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/