Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190323034619.15792-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20190325150133.GA4102@linux.ibm.com> <CAEXW_YRDfOEr-hdbKGDC6amRaaqTCCBsowRhVwDqJd-1BoO17g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190325164253.GE4102@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190325164253.GE4102@linux.ibm.com>
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:40:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YT8dS--pBrQoBO=G_d+4Ffi7o2++PQukh6dyNHqX-TLBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcutorture: Select from only online CPUs
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:42 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:33:37PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:02 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:46:19PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > > The rcutorture jitter.sh script selects a random CPU but does not check
> > > > if it is offline or online. This leads to taskset errors many times. On
> > > > my machine, hyper threading is disabled so half the cores are offline
> > > > causing taskset errors a lot of times. Let us fix this by checking from
> > > > only the online CPUs on the system.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > >
> > > Good catch!
> > >
> > > Please see below for one suggestion for simplification.
> > >
> > >                                                         Thanx, Paul
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/jitter.sh | 11 ++++++++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/jitter.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/jitter.sh
> > > > index 3633828375e3..53bf9d99b5cd 100755
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/jitter.sh
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/jitter.sh
> > > > @@ -47,10 +47,19 @@ do
> > > >               exit 0;
> > > >       fi
> > > >
> > > > -     # Set affinity to randomly selected CPU
> > > > +     # Set affinity to randomly selected online CPU
> > > >       cpus=`ls /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/online |
> > >
> > >         cpus=`grep 1 /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/online |
> >
> > Yes, this is better. Lets do it this way :)
> >
> > > >               sed -e 's,/[^/]*$,,' -e 's/^[^0-9]*//' |
> > > >               grep -v '^0*$'`
> > >
> > > Of course, now I have no idea why I excluded CPU 0...  :-/
> >
> > Yes, I was wondering as well about that :-)
>
> Please feel free to try including CPU 0 and running the set of single-CPU
> rcutorture scenarios.  ;-)

Will do and then will update the patch by adding the CPU back, if all
is well. Thanks.