Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264046AbUCZNVY (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:21:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264047AbUCZNVY (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:21:24 -0500 Received: from nsmtp.pacific.net.th ([203.121.130.117]:45735 "EHLO nsmtp.pacific.net.th") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264046AbUCZNVV (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:21:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:17:03 +0800 From: "Michael Frank" To: "Pavel Machek" Subject: Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Cc: "Nigel Cunningham" , "Suspend development list" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" References: <20040323233228.GK364@elf.ucw.cz> <20040325014107.GB6094@elf.ucw.cz> <200403250857.08920.matthias.wieser@hiasl.net> <1080247142.6679.3.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au> <20040325222745.GE2179@elf.ucw.cz> <1080250718.6674.35.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au> <20040325225453.GH2179@elf.ucw.cz> <20040326105023.GA360@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed delsp=yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040326105023.GA360@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.50 (Linux, build 615) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2319 Lines: 81 On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:50:23 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> >> > only "non compressed" part to reach mainline for 2.6. Feature freeze >> >> > was few months ago, and "adding possibility to compress swsusp data" >> >> > does not sound like a bugfix to me... >> >> >> >> Feature freeze is always half unfrozen anyway. 2.4 just gained XFS! >> >> I'm >> > >> > XFS probably has 10+ people working on it, full time, and it still >> > required quite a lot of pushing. >> >> We could push harder. Should we ask all swsusp2 users using >> compression to announce themselves on LKML? ;) > > Hmm, I've one such troll announcing into my inbox, sending stuff like > below. I hope he's the only one. Is not what I had in mind. Please accept that people are benefitially using compression, both lzf and gzip. The individual in question has poor taste, I would never call anyone my favorite dessert ;) Michael > > Subject: Microsoft RULES!!! > To: Pavel Machek > ... > > So stop spreading nonsense about "NO COMPROMISES" and > stop comparing > me to Mickey$oft. Thanks. > > --------------------- > > Such a CUNT!!! Microsoft do very well engineered > software, something Linux can't sadly achive in ages > if still emply LOOSERS LIKE U. > > When a Microsoft engineer see a people like u, simply > laugh!!! > > U MORON. U ARE SUCH A STUPID CUNT, NOW ALL THE LIST > KNOW ABOUT U, WE ALL LAUGHT! > > and > >> So swsusp2 does _not_ fail. You still have a usable > system instead of a >> paniced system you seem to like to accept. > > If swsusp1 panics system, that's a bug. I'm not > accepting that one. > > Refusing to suspend (I'd call it "fail to suspend") is > bad but is not > a bug. Do we understand each other now? > > ------------- > > U know, I used to call u your name this days: STUPID, > IDIOT, MORON, but that's not enough. > > Your last sentence related with your CRAPPY, LURID, > DANGEROUS swsusp1 qualify u as what u are. > > A WORST GEEK, A LOOSER, A STUPID CUNT: U WONT EVER > ADMIT YOUR PROGRAM CRASH AND THAT IS A BUG :-(((( > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/