Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1550217319-40418-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
 <CAK7LNASzd=bL1H34w-E_UD9x6w2=ObyS+EPDZ_jrvfV+ncw-yA@mail.gmail.com> <1691b160-5558-d4c3-afed-5773e115c5aa@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <1691b160-5558-d4c3-afed-5773e115c5aa@web.de>
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:54:38 +0900
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASVRbroW9_j1Kda3azHb6PzD3WyVAsKe0HfD1ri0RFPOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc:     Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>,
        Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@hotmail.com>,
        Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn>,
        cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:19 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:
>
> > Applied to linux-kbuild.
>
> A questionable development version was integrated for this SmPL script.


Sorry for my bad job.

I usually use LKML patchwork to find patches.

When I searched "Wen Yang", v6 did not show up for some reasons.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=&submitter=22638&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=

So, I just thought v5 was the latest one
and I was completely missing the context.


Apology.

Masahiro


> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci?id=da9cfb87a44da61f2403c4312916befcb6b6d7e8
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn/
>
>
> Now I am curious on how such a source code analysis approach will be
> improved further.
> Which changes will get the desired acceptance?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1053979/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1553321671-27749-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn/
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-March/005679.html
>
> Regards,
> Markus
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada