Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:12:51 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To:     qiaozhou <qiaozhou@asrmicro.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: add support for ASR AquilaC SoC
Message-ID: <20190326081251.GE32613@kadam>
References: <1553389083-13237-1-git-send-email-qiaozhou@asrmicro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1553389083-13237-1-git-send-email-qiaozhou@asrmicro.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


I'm not the right person to send this to...

$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)


On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 08:58:03AM +0800, qiaozhou wrote:
> From: Qiao Zhou <qiaozhou@asrmicro.com>
> 
> Add ARCH_ASR

You'll need to expand this.

> 
> Signed-off-by: qiaozhou <qiaozhou@asrmicro.com>
                 ^^^^^^^^
Use Qiao Zhou so it matches the From header.


> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> index 70498a0..da8d43a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> @@ -278,4 +278,10 @@ config ARCH_ZYNQMP
>  	help
>  	  This enables support for Xilinx ZynqMP Family
>  
> +config ARCH_ASR
> +	bool "ASR Microelectronics chip Family"
> +	select PINCTRL
> +	help
> +	  This enables support for ASR Microelectronics chip Family, including:
> +	  - ASR 8751C SoC
>  endmenu

Was this supposed to be part of the patch you sent earlier?  You will
need to resend that one as a v2 patch.

regards,
dan carpenter