Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp4675835img; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:25:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwA9pP9wON6ug92AprllBVAdk/FtEYoM5XwzJoMSkAfJ5ImBc4Mpp6E/msX0mm/UD2iu5+1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:3a5:: with SMTP id d34mr31927396pld.174.1553635521444; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:25:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553635521; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FREaFCVsq09M4Yb7XqT8l1HQRpAxpVtCWZOXe78QemR0x5hYDM/UUHqAz/aWzkto9m pXTziKymqNCDIQz0lJxUeXPjxFArzciKF8QsDtskozB7NJ9mEUNtLMdfi9aeRSmXFK8d Q8tSqVwbqfwfDatlFjScV4P+I1f5ZnW5NZRHeSuIWQl424rNA+1ibWzzeQZay+CvorNm yfEwLb4iBR3zi1RHLlCxjKcpA0QSlw4WFm05sT9+Ef+NZs9r/T+bvC/D8GP8u0jrNcue p1cDfOSqby+4ulTsjrqMbnmvtqr1upZ380SW8+tZ8BOyiWPadq6oFAOgmk9SBuYcx5s5 PjJQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=OcjmdNESlcojtPy4xmgtB+CbW+Ka5nbaWxATNl5pLUQ=; b=FI1C4QNGdTs3JBU9cSEBJy7wjLzpE9Ve9VaXGGwJzQUafkL241OhhomhkAzv3A13Ib 1HQdJJDx6CdKaBaKtpRcxBVDSG8WqSqvCK+RtfZcWAFcxIH6CH0++hPMkPofy+0e7MaY sg9F0hoBUrpuKF7b8JXcNAaOT2thvdHFCitwWePDMXuqY12S0/Ue/X29AxVflQm1dwtg oZ4DMxjZ7HLzOO6lYpT8yE4942MrctRmRgMKvYjt4Uf4KAxRo5rfBDfeMkG9AY+kuA3S WOalSh7zdr3G0zY/ohBC5Kb2jme50t+/wnXigAINONPVOsOJsG83LxJyGdp7Yxr+zngf bh6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bj1si17098227plb.15.2019.03.26.14.25.05; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732479AbfCZVXP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:23:15 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:49514 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731617AbfCZVXO (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:23:14 -0400 Received: from p5492e2fc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.146.226.252] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1h8tWr-0006dc-M9; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 22:22:41 +0100 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 22:22:40 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ricardo Neri cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Ashok Raj , Andi Kleen , Peter Zijlstra , "Ravi V. Shankar" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ricardo Neri , "H. Peter Anvin" , Tony Luck , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Don Zickus , Nicholas Piggin , Michael Ellerman , Frederic Weisbecker , Alexei Starovoitov , Babu Moger , Paul Mackerras , Mathieu Desnoyers , Masami Hiramatsu , Andrew Morton , Philippe Ombredanne , Colin Ian King , Byungchul Park , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Waiman Long , Josh Poimboeuf , Randy Dunlap , Davidlohr Bueso , Christoffer Dall , Marc Zyngier , Kai-Heng Feng , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , David Rientjes , "David S. Miller" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/14] kernel/watchdog: Add a function to obtain the watchdog_allowed_mask In-Reply-To: <1551283518-18922-11-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <1551283518-18922-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <1551283518-18922-11-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > -struct cpumask watchdog_allowed_mask __read_mostly; > +static struct cpumask watchdog_allowed_mask __read_mostly; That hunk is correct. > struct cpumask watchdog_cpumask __read_mostly; > unsigned long *watchdog_cpumask_bits = cpumask_bits(&watchdog_cpumask); > @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ static int __init hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace_setup(char *str) > } > __setup("hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace=", hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace_setup); > # endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ > + > +struct cpumask *watchdog_get_allowed_cpumask(void) > +{ > + return &watchdog_allowed_mask; > +} That part is pointless as I showed you in the other reply. You don't need that mask in your code at all. Thanks, tglx