Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp4820161img; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:09:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZdaQrbf6J7jtZ3HrdD/+OFuWB2gaWAKITMiyolumyBZ3ISsBh6wHGFqM/gZriSKToD1sI X-Received: by 2002:a63:2b03:: with SMTP id r3mr30712914pgr.1.1553648956694; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:09:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553648956; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dZnwJCwRLcNydTa/SW1b2JFhgHCLmX43iSsU+bOAYvUHRvWcEY3AEJP9xYqUarmNxd CXO/32xusnRNFXeEWQOzzVPiiBycktEC1zGfxBgQriO9X4iq4SwKrKlv7C3PKsJd6Nfg wVhWPADLDWq1gYTObKqmV37QCUKYrtV/+T8Tv1GNaanYF/vC8Nw2mcB1tFXZMCsq37/g TRhK8ZGY/tNEMG7sk4SPIHVjqMAecMX1KgtQIB/m0A0Wb1Y1PWxuFP7KulH/+GFtzPgN cDVlR+wYh41pQWS7cBUNNYCAbeFsBfOKCy/xVnRF5Bjz+4COwkWZYC/U+dBcseM30tG0 L3sQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=HauKM3Gw4u5uLW8r3ZGNX3R9FMtA/3JauQvnGAIYBn4=; b=vnxWI09RxoUO1191i7aI1kjP8pdCkhB4rUA9FEG9WIkvbVN3MUajzY3JbtuHX9wvPF 0xDhrVKLoVoZLJYwLRqANCUMCbBleH0iuBBzGD6LUHbaKHBiUeKQjd5g2Khwg8Fy/7oY F9+RHZ+0j8VHvcICQ3QJG+2X858aMbGZxmfieyDqZzOIIfaJ9mOBabEfSLE0PU3h0qGK Y8pHtQUX3VmLvJ3QA1zSzVjr00fVRRMngwHaIVNU+G8eckf5xG7g6x5G8lHBjjtu8y5n SOzOPLgmBqBV76I7vT1QXd5PtuRmdzxCrBQ6hcyo9NBgU9NlmBjhbhwY5aUNuVd0LdPS 9hMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w69si12833307pgd.11.2019.03.26.18.09.01; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732117AbfC0BIQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:08:16 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:56511 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731701AbfC0BIP (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:08:15 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2019 18:08:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,274,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="155508782" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.137]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2019 18:08:14 -0700 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9A0DA301BD4; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:08:14 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Andi Kleen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] x86, lto: Mark all top level asm statements as .text Message-ID: <20190327010814.GR18020@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20190321220009.29334-1-andi@firstfloor.org> <20190321220009.29334-3-andi@firstfloor.org> <20190326213803.GN18020@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20190327005523.bbxxittqf4d5bdz5@two.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190327005523.bbxxittqf4d5bdz5@two.firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Following up to myself here... > > If it's the former, then we must backport those fixes. > > > > Could you please verify with the GCC people as you seem to have a > > reproducer of some sort. > > Okay. I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89839 > > I thought I had already done that, but it seems I didn't. Looks like they think the kernel should be fixed. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89839 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- No, toplevel inline-asm should never assume what section it is in. -Andi