Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp5631150img; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:05:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyH9Xf6ewTaXnHka/mrZlgA4TfuYzbp83Kgc4yzNvCr8ZtM2tMu3cNKLSrCGl++FjUQMP9x X-Received: by 2002:a63:4144:: with SMTP id o65mr36123327pga.241.1553713510470; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:05:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553713510; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cxdnWcH9bzMmxIRc4WlOEXsQrak+2lWOHLMBiL0eRFSrUEKccDIGpQqApX9h6CtiHw Epe9fZCZuc7LFHF5ZJxst00mIF7dJruNDmKcv1/K2woEARosTjZY88vJ/qCdNaCq/s1d ePeZRoyFSCbVgKC155zY57nHOUWGimSVNxfqnnEGDSz8qz7Ktq0ndOVBKCAub3E1KHN4 pEuyIL0LKH0s0LcxX/bTrUOYTPse1ey1At17h9/NG+5/GogZpdUeXzjNPysl+En0eOPM OWryeqqvitWnqspt2mf96yz/dt3vTPa9vxLeMHwuocimiwRk2TakfL0A0zCcunYw6oPw 4Mug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=WfckFHH01n1ajswHR8orL80mRf3GFCwh8AMmQC8IAac=; b=pzYGRCpdeingjk4XESt3+hKsORUdH6x6ebhUHcL5/yxrwi42HZLCJ1Qr8kK6v8UKpb t3Q6TGg2KPmVL6rPJnuZknRpA81VwH75zBOUJoGrNgJonJ9SnW5IfB2SLtTGMoDfXGS7 hPZvmkrSh5FgQKqNCgMQvNYwjd9t4IyazRGOcRhTTr+QW/tgjXOvca9R/O+J8UAJWEso m8z8xzJ91qtBe/ZyUaqNgp8bNOtt3EYgL1gCgIGHbuRgT/bAu1BCtZ9kipw3e+ja+pnP BxD/fH6KT/ezAFq4BmxLasrTSIvf0fFjKhkVlCuj5EZbzcKBfCTB5doEGMl1UpxafqUR w3EA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k131si8968512pga.267.2019.03.27.12.04.54; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388848AbfC0TEU (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:04:20 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:45642 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389498AbfC0TEO (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:04:14 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2RIsNka059060 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:04:13 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rgdxu2hp2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:04:12 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:04:10 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:04:05 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x2RJ44Kl54919208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:04:04 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552BD5205A; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:04:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhcp-9-31-103-153.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.103.153]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951FD52054; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:04:02 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: add a function for transferring status to string From: Mimi Zohar To: Ard Biesheuvel , "Lee, Chun-Yi" Cc: James Morris , "Serge E . Hallyn" , David Howells , Josh Boyer , Nayna Jain , linux-efi , linux-security-module , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Lee, Chun-Yi" , Kees Cook , Anton Vorontsov , Colin Cross , Tony Luck Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:04:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20190324002621.3551-1-jlee@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19032719-0016-0000-0000-00000267DC29 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19032719-0017-0000-0000-000032C31AB4 Message-Id: <1553713442.4608.20.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-03-27_12:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903270133 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 19:58 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Sun, 24 Mar 2019 at 01:26, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote: > > > > This function can be used to transfer EFI status code to string > > for printing out debug message. Using this function can improve > > the readability of log. Maybe instead of "for transferring status" use "to convert the status value to a" in the Subject line and here in the patch description. > > > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel > > Cc: Kees Cook > > Cc: Anton Vorontsov > > Cc: Colin Cross > > Cc: Tony Luck > > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" > > --- > > include/linux/efi.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h > > index 54357a258b35..a43cb0dc37af 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/efi.h > > +++ b/include/linux/efi.h > > @@ -1768,4 +1768,32 @@ struct linux_efi_memreserve { > > #define EFI_MEMRESERVE_COUNT(size) (((size) - sizeof(struct linux_efi_memreserve)) \ > > / sizeof(((struct linux_efi_memreserve *)0)->entry[0])) > > > > +#define EFI_STATUS_STR(_status) \ > > +case EFI_##_status: \ > > + return "EFI_" __stringify(_status); > > + > > +static inline char * > > +efi_status_to_str(efi_status_t status) > > +{ > > + switch (status) { > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(SUCCESS) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(LOAD_ERROR) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(INVALID_PARAMETER) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(UNSUPPORTED) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(BAD_BUFFER_SIZE) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(NOT_READY) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(DEVICE_ERROR) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(WRITE_PROTECTED) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(OUT_OF_RESOURCES) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(NOT_FOUND) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(ABORTED) > > + EFI_STATUS_STR(SECURITY_VIOLATION) > > + default: > > + pr_warn("Unknown efi status: 0x%lx", status); > > + } > > + > > + return "Unknown efi status"; > > +} > > + > > #endif /* _LINUX_EFI_H */ > > -- > > 2.16.4 > > > > Please turn this into a proper function so that not every calling > object has to duplicate all these strings. Hi Ard, Keeping the status values and strings in sync is difficult. I was going to suggest moving the macro immediately after the status value definitions. MimiĀ