Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] integrity: support EC-RDSA signatures for
 asymmetric_verify
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:21:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20190327201441.ikw76qzpgzm6t35b@altlinux.org>
References: <20190326125842.24110-1-vt@altlinux.org>
         <20190326125842.24110-11-vt@altlinux.org>
         <1553710220.4608.9.camel@linux.ibm.com>
         <20190327201441.ikw76qzpgzm6t35b@altlinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <1553718067.4608.43.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> > diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c
b/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c
> > > index d775e03fbbcc..99080871eb9f 100644
> > > --- a/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c
> > > +++ b/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c
> > > @@ -104,9 +104,16 @@ int asymmetric_verify(struct key *keyring, const char *sig,
> > >  
> > >  	memset(&pks, 0, sizeof(pks));
> > >  
> > > -	pks.pkey_algo = "rsa";
> > >  	pks.hash_algo = hash_algo_name[hdr->hash_algo];
> > > -	pks.encoding = "pkcs1";
> > > +	if (hdr->hash_algo == HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_256 ||
> > > +	    hdr->hash_algo == HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_512) {
> > > +		/* EC-RDSA and Streebog should go together. */
> > > +		pks.pkey_algo = "ecrdsa";
> > > +		pks.encoding = "raw";
> > 
> > IMA signatures are stored as xattrs, making them persistent.  Support
> > for streebog was upstreamed in linux-5.0.  This change would break
> > existing systems using streebog.  As long as this is not yet a concern
> 
> In what sense it would break systems?

For example, if executable files are currently labeled with
rsa/streebog signatures, then enforcing file data integrity I assume
would break if the kernel uses ecrdsa/streebog.

Mimi

> 
> Unless kernel crashes or signature is recognized as valid, I think, it should
> not be called a break.
> 
> > Reviewed-by:  Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > 
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		pks.pkey_algo = "rsa";
> > > +		pks.encoding = "pkcs1";
> > > +	}
> > >  	pks.digest = (u8 *)data;
> > >  	pks.digest_size = datalen;
> > >  	pks.s = hdr->sig;
>