Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190307123254.348-1-omosnace@redhat.com> <CAHC9VhQavjf5M2wDU2jfFe3NpsxCd_mFjtrUC-0jujZFj2tTdg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhQavjf5M2wDU2jfFe3NpsxCd_mFjtrUC-0jujZFj2tTdg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:36:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CALAqxLVbGRgJFgNU-45QvLe0SiPP+VMw3Jx_jrLQvAhgs2ZQqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ghak10 v6 0/2] audit: Log changes that can affect the
 system clock
To:     Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc:     Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
        Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, linux-audit@redhat.com,
        Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
        Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 7:50 AM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> These patches look fine to me, but it would be really nice to get an
> ACK from the time folks before I merge this into audit/next.  Time
> folks, I know you've looked at previous versions of this patchset, can
> you give this a quick look to make sure everything is still okay from
> your perspective?
>

Sorry for the slow response.  I briefly looked it over and it seems
simple enough, so don't really have any objections. Though I don't
have as sharp an eye (or opinion :) as Thomas, so no promises he won't
step in with an issue.

I do want to make sure folks are careful with future changes to
audit_log(), but that's my usual hand-wringing.

thanks
-john