Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 28 Mar 2019 11:11:51 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc:     linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        geert@linux-m68k.org, preid@electromag.com.au,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 10/11] gpio: 74x164: Utilize the for_each_set_clump8
 macro
Message-ID: <20190328091151.GU9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <cover.1553661964.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
 <645f16f1d1ad3f215e34a82f457e06725fcf8f56.1553661964.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
 <20190327123314.GJ9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20190328044004.GB3251@icarus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190328044004.GB3251@icarus>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 01:40:04PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:33:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:02:39PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > > Replace verbose implementation in set_multiple callback with
> > > for_each_set_clump8 macro to simplify code and improve clarity.
> > 
> > > +	for_each_set_clump8(offset, bankmask, mask, chip->registers * 8) {
> > 
> > > +		bank = (chip->registers - 1) - (offset / 8);
> > 
> > Excessive parens, but it's minor.
> 
> Fair point, this could do without parens around (chip->registers - 1).

And around division too.

> Since this and renaming 'idx' to 'index' in find_bit.c are such a minor
> changes, I'll wait first to see if something else comes up to be fixed
> in this review. If so, I'll add these changes to the next version of
> this patchset.

It seems inline proposal would going to be implemented.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko