Received: by 2002:a25:5b86:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id p128csp651760ybb; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:28:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxoO5A05AxZFk30GsKwon/6S94kt4F3UfBbrUs1qU80MuNnNy0E4Is0pEMr3hB1gNDLESTi X-Received: by 2002:a62:448d:: with SMTP id m13mr43198771pfi.182.1553790538848; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:28:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553790538; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S+Ucj7aKtFT+C2TyXxSv7pO2C2Y9YiLIlzY8GB6LLK5EXkEq98up9pZ4yaXg4yeAmH x4C1cCRMtNwNlPKi38KDQjQDiRR3DNDZurq85EiPIUQz5hY/d7sLNo/aR7VJO75hQYpE S/GgMtxecNJ5oachdMz8yRWiH+RuQyb0LpFkfBWF+kiMEXdcJkreiB4H8tVwOk2etEp7 +a5rShCV49Fcj55r/2ob+u9Z88RAj4axsl4j/QaXoRfeVUjYB0xcMCjRbkuSR42rDXYb 9thneu4V8aBFNGIKzykqWckIXgy3j2F593e4ftGs47dDdqAATCfmxQ6jGz0cSfTWKcUV FxLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:reply-to; bh=VVLxwpYKghTbSuPCmPn5W/PaNu8TQUjJDmGk+8raxGk=; b=qou6urNpfc5aUM9f/5eliJi7QjIDvUmZ2Bsd+vqBsWF82/62aqIn+Ql0Ll8IJx1zRF vtupkETBI9h7WPRzIG3Cx6Z+UtZtwKBwZcPHxXuUzOnN57R6/w3Mh5ysM3OZpQPPfg64 C2ahmJhjodpAxdxxyd542iBlVSloSRZV7YxfG1NeQa8i+nlC0SzN2FwPFXc15jWrPvgl Uy7cWQ7sQ7Gy7InFEOR/0Z9h3GXbDMhaOqFGCl7fQinhHYKVICmvx0+CcraiqM17Aqq/ QQGILKe9iLnVBVAqdNy4jTp0gDC+m3cn/pmb63YyIFSIBEuRxdc5PO2xeDezvWt5tERs uB5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h11si20786401pgs.432.2019.03.28.09.28.42; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727392AbfC1Q1w (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:27:52 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:42138 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726375AbfC1Q1v (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:27:51 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2SGK2QI054045 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:27:50 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rh1ndrfdy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:27:50 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:27:48 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:27:44 -0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x2SGRg9x41418868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:27:42 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA8A4C046; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:27:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1284C044; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:27:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.152.222.62] (unknown [9.152.222.62]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:27:42 +0000 (GMT) Reply-To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] s390: ap: setup relation betwen KVM and mediated device To: Tony Krowiak , borntraeger@de.ibm.com Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, mimu@linux.ibm.com References: <1553265828-27823-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <1553265828-27823-4-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <1ea236d1-ca0b-03c0-3699-0c0deb435785@linux.ibm.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:27:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1ea236d1-ca0b-03c0-3699-0c0deb435785@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19032816-0020-0000-0000-00000328F23E X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19032816-0021-0000-0000-0000217B3AD4 Message-Id: <3cd496d0-3eec-78e8-9ea5-4d62fe0cff1c@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-03-28_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903280110 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28/03/2019 17:12, Tony Krowiak wrote: > On 3/22/19 10:43 AM, Pierre Morel wrote: >> When the mediated device is open we setup the relation with KVM unset it >> when the mediated device is released. > > s/open we setup/open, we set up/ > s/with KVM unset/with KVM and unset/ > >> >> We lock the matrix mediated device to avoid any change until the >> open is done. >> We make sure that KVM is present when opening the mediated device >> otherwise we return an error. > > s/mediated device/mediated device,/ > >> >> Increase kvm's refcount to ensure the KVM structures are still available >> during the use of the mediated device by the guest. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel >> --- >>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 143 >> +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >>   1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> index 77f7bac..bdb36e0 100644 >> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> @@ -787,74 +787,24 @@ static const struct attribute_group >> *vfio_ap_mdev_attr_groups[] = { >>       NULL >>   }; >> -/** >> - * vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm >> - * >> - * @matrix_mdev: a mediated matrix device >> - * @kvm: reference to KVM instance >> - * >> - * Verifies no other mediated matrix device has @kvm and sets a >> reference to >> - * it in @matrix_mdev->kvm. >> - * >> - * Return 0 if no other mediated matrix device has a reference to @kvm; >> - * otherwise, returns an -EPERM. >> - */ >> -static int vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev, >> -                struct kvm *kvm) >> -{ >> -    struct ap_matrix_mdev *m; >> - >> -    mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock); >> - >> -    list_for_each_entry(m, &matrix_dev->mdev_list, node) { >> -        if ((m != matrix_mdev) && (m->kvm == kvm)) { >> -            mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock); >> -            return -EPERM; >> -        } >> -    } >> - >> -    matrix_mdev->kvm = kvm; >> -    mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock); >> - >> -    return 0; >> -} >> - >>   static int vfio_ap_mdev_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, >>                          unsigned long action, void *data) >>   { >> -    int ret; >>       struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev; >>       if (action != VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM) >>           return NOTIFY_OK; >>       matrix_mdev = container_of(nb, struct ap_matrix_mdev, >> group_notifier); >> - >> -    if (!data) { >> -        matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL; >> -        return NOTIFY_OK; >> -    } >> - >> -    ret = vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(matrix_mdev, data); >> -    if (ret) >> -        return NOTIFY_DONE; >> - >> -    /* If there is no CRYCB pointer, then we can't copy the masks */ >> -    if (!matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd) >> -        return NOTIFY_DONE; >> - >> -    kvm_arch_crypto_set_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm, matrix_mdev->matrix.apm, >> -                  matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm, >> -                  matrix_mdev->matrix.adm); >> +    matrix_mdev->kvm = data; >>       return NOTIFY_OK; >>   } >> -static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct mdev_device *mdev) >> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev) >>   { >>       int ret; >>       int rc = 0; >> -    struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev); >>       struct vfio_ap_queue *q; >>       list_for_each_entry(q, &matrix_mdev->qlist, list) { >> @@ -871,41 +821,106 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct >> mdev_device *mdev) >>       return rc; >>   } >> +/** >> + * vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm >> + * >> + * @matrix_mdev: a mediated matrix device >> + * >> + * - Verifies that the hook is free and install the PQAP hook >> + * - Copy the matrix masks inside the CRYCB >> + * - Increment the KVM rerference count >> + * >> + * Return 0 if no other mediated matrix device has a reference to @kvm; >> + * otherwise, returns an -EPERM. >> + */ >> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev) >> +{ >> +    if (matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook) >> +        return -EPERM; > > How would this happen; in other words, why are we checking this? I check this to verify that no other AP mediated device is already in use by this VM. Regards, Pierre -- Pierre Morel Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany