Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 20:27:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 20:27:33 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:7697 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 20:27:23 -0400 Subject: Re: vmalloc on 2.4.x on ia64 To: hiren_mehta@agilent.com Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 01:28:49 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Matt_Domsch@Dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "hiren_mehta@agilent.com" at Apr 04, 2001 06:11:32 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I am calling during initialization only from detect() entry point. > But I guess, before the detect() is called, scsi layer acquires > the io_request_lock. So, you mean to say that I need to release it That depends if your driver is doing old or new style initialization > before calling vmalloc() ? I was doing the same thing on 2.2.x > and even on 2.4.0 and it was working fine and now suddenly > it stopped working on 2.4.2. So what are the guidelines for using > vmalloc() if we want to use it in scsi low-level (HBA) driver ? You can use vmalloc in any situation where you are in task context and can sleep. > I am currently using the new error handling code. (use_new_eh_code = TRUE). Then yes you would need to drop the lock if my memory serves me rightly. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/