Received: by 2002:a25:5b86:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id p128csp785933ybb; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:09:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzOC7g2owjXINJDXKXdGjcyGu/bWghYg/leNCFMmxkKCkywGNAuyv0yYDrMOMYrzBoznygI X-Received: by 2002:a62:1c13:: with SMTP id c19mr4447643pfc.11.1553800167782; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:09:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553800167; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bkcA06mJHvToKsS3dXc/BQ/E8F3fyKGWtKzjAnzJScW9e90OBIWTDe3BwD6rJjwHmF PZWCec0RACapzdYLSuxmYwYG4qn8NhylSNWFn/0rOKzRl4JfKGtn8Wu+0GB2C2e8XofC VVwOud6o+bqQHHT8Mz+u4BBuiMD9JDK7LpVurUIjA9l3FwMZd7K8HgsO8bSGJJjkdll1 GcOox4NG58tt3tfF67SAJwUNt3gQ/p7W02fQqv92Rpe1M/k8QfTfaSm5sGYC/TqRU4br 7D8wBWTtwvLZNDMLrWTAJsquna8dEM/QKnLTeJXkW5uBsSMw/jHbR7hKT4aGphY0HQcz dZaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=RU8IfyAQFAM8iEo48URnmWs/BSFNZnqK4yhrK3iqpOo=; b=XJG6ueJmz14ajZymWRGmhx7AUNdvmTIKAn7vGZ0NqaR19Zf7S89YXz4LZlU2Fw3quS DkSqdkiAmfIOyBL+cjCp3PHFYL/0TOxCcnKLqx31+jr9vf8jEi97Hutk7qrc6Z6HMTHw F0ROsmwBNO9y+pUk+eUjZAhtaxMoXVrIBMM+wbekdMvrb5BvD55SBuiT5iluEeSzVoAY mgvOpd2/OB152d0mpURHfx0FgE93XnBuG0f1YgOW6qPMrL3TZrjWGPL+o0GkHtaFOH6C AJ7ymwOmtZyxGdY/0xWi26Enxl+AvlXSKjplLxjQA4X1y6JjNALUAg4UbwsSQzxL6E8F pSRA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q3si13275646pgp.40.2019.03.28.12.09.11; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726156AbfC1TI2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:08:28 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:26240 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725852AbfC1TI2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:08:28 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Mar 2019 12:08:27 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,281,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="332944081" Received: from iweiny-desk2.sc.intel.com ([10.3.52.157]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2019 12:08:27 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 04:07:20 -0700 From: Ira Weiny To: jglisse@redhat.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Hubbard , Andrew Morton , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] mm/hmm: use reference counting for HMM struct v2 Message-ID: <20190328110719.GA31324@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20190325144011.10560-1-jglisse@redhat.com> <20190325144011.10560-3-jglisse@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190325144011.10560-3-jglisse@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:40:02AM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > From: J?r?me Glisse > > Every time i read the code to check that the HMM structure does not > vanish before it should thanks to the many lock protecting its removal > i get a headache. Switch to reference counting instead it is much > easier to follow and harder to break. This also remove some code that > is no longer needed with refcounting. > > Changes since v1: > - removed bunch of useless check (if API is use with bogus argument > better to fail loudly so user fix their code) > - s/hmm_get/mm_get_hmm/ > > Signed-off-by: J?r?me Glisse > Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell > Cc: John Hubbard > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Dan Williams > --- > include/linux/hmm.h | 2 + > mm/hmm.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h > index ad50b7b4f141..716fc61fa6d4 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hmm.h > +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h > @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ enum hmm_pfn_value_e { > /* > * struct hmm_range - track invalidation lock on virtual address range > * > + * @hmm: the core HMM structure this range is active against > * @vma: the vm area struct for the range > * @list: all range lock are on a list > * @start: range virtual start address (inclusive) > @@ -142,6 +143,7 @@ enum hmm_pfn_value_e { > * @valid: pfns array did not change since it has been fill by an HMM function > */ > struct hmm_range { > + struct hmm *hmm; > struct vm_area_struct *vma; > struct list_head list; > unsigned long start; > diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c > index fe1cd87e49ac..306e57f7cded 100644 > --- a/mm/hmm.c > +++ b/mm/hmm.c > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static const struct mmu_notifier_ops hmm_mmu_notifier_ops; > */ > struct hmm { > struct mm_struct *mm; > + struct kref kref; > spinlock_t lock; > struct list_head ranges; > struct list_head mirrors; > @@ -57,6 +58,16 @@ struct hmm { > struct rw_semaphore mirrors_sem; > }; > > +static inline struct hmm *mm_get_hmm(struct mm_struct *mm) > +{ > + struct hmm *hmm = READ_ONCE(mm->hmm); > + > + if (hmm && kref_get_unless_zero(&hmm->kref)) > + return hmm; > + > + return NULL; > +} > + > /* > * hmm_register - register HMM against an mm (HMM internal) > * > @@ -67,14 +78,9 @@ struct hmm { > */ > static struct hmm *hmm_register(struct mm_struct *mm) > { > - struct hmm *hmm = READ_ONCE(mm->hmm); > + struct hmm *hmm = mm_get_hmm(mm); FWIW: having hmm_register == "hmm get" is a bit confusing... Ira > bool cleanup = false; > > - /* > - * The hmm struct can only be freed once the mm_struct goes away, > - * hence we should always have pre-allocated an new hmm struct > - * above. > - */ > if (hmm) > return hmm; > > @@ -86,6 +92,7 @@ static struct hmm *hmm_register(struct mm_struct *mm) > hmm->mmu_notifier.ops = NULL; > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hmm->ranges); > spin_lock_init(&hmm->lock); > + kref_init(&hmm->kref); > hmm->mm = mm; > > spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock); > @@ -106,7 +113,7 @@ static struct hmm *hmm_register(struct mm_struct *mm) > if (__mmu_notifier_register(&hmm->mmu_notifier, mm)) > goto error_mm; > > - return mm->hmm; > + return hmm; > > error_mm: > spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock); > @@ -118,9 +125,41 @@ static struct hmm *hmm_register(struct mm_struct *mm) > return NULL; > } > > +static void hmm_free(struct kref *kref) > +{ > + struct hmm *hmm = container_of(kref, struct hmm, kref); > + struct mm_struct *mm = hmm->mm; > + > + mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release(&hmm->mmu_notifier, mm); > + > + spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock); > + if (mm->hmm == hmm) > + mm->hmm = NULL; > + spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock); > + > + kfree(hmm); > +} > + > +static inline void hmm_put(struct hmm *hmm) > +{ > + kref_put(&hmm->kref, hmm_free); > +} > + > void hmm_mm_destroy(struct mm_struct *mm) > { > - kfree(mm->hmm); > + struct hmm *hmm; > + > + spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock); > + hmm = mm_get_hmm(mm); > + mm->hmm = NULL; > + if (hmm) { > + hmm->mm = NULL; > + spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock); > + hmm_put(hmm); > + return; > + } > + > + spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock); > } > > static int hmm_invalidate_range(struct hmm *hmm, bool device, > @@ -165,7 +204,7 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range(struct hmm *hmm, bool device, > static void hmm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm) > { > struct hmm_mirror *mirror; > - struct hmm *hmm = mm->hmm; > + struct hmm *hmm = mm_get_hmm(mm); > > down_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem); > mirror = list_first_entry_or_null(&hmm->mirrors, struct hmm_mirror, > @@ -186,13 +225,16 @@ static void hmm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm) > struct hmm_mirror, list); > } > up_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem); > + > + hmm_put(hmm); > } > > static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn, > const struct mmu_notifier_range *range) > { > + struct hmm *hmm = mm_get_hmm(range->mm); > struct hmm_update update; > - struct hmm *hmm = range->mm->hmm; > + int ret; > > VM_BUG_ON(!hmm); > > @@ -200,14 +242,16 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn, > update.end = range->end; > update.event = HMM_UPDATE_INVALIDATE; > update.blockable = range->blockable; > - return hmm_invalidate_range(hmm, true, &update); > + ret = hmm_invalidate_range(hmm, true, &update); > + hmm_put(hmm); > + return ret; > } > > static void hmm_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn, > const struct mmu_notifier_range *range) > { > + struct hmm *hmm = mm_get_hmm(range->mm); > struct hmm_update update; > - struct hmm *hmm = range->mm->hmm; > > VM_BUG_ON(!hmm); > > @@ -216,6 +260,7 @@ static void hmm_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn, > update.event = HMM_UPDATE_INVALIDATE; > update.blockable = true; > hmm_invalidate_range(hmm, false, &update); > + hmm_put(hmm); > } > > static const struct mmu_notifier_ops hmm_mmu_notifier_ops = { > @@ -241,24 +286,13 @@ int hmm_mirror_register(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct mm_struct *mm) > if (!mm || !mirror || !mirror->ops) > return -EINVAL; > > -again: > mirror->hmm = hmm_register(mm); > if (!mirror->hmm) > return -ENOMEM; > > down_write(&mirror->hmm->mirrors_sem); > - if (mirror->hmm->mm == NULL) { > - /* > - * A racing hmm_mirror_unregister() is about to destroy the hmm > - * struct. Try again to allocate a new one. > - */ > - up_write(&mirror->hmm->mirrors_sem); > - mirror->hmm = NULL; > - goto again; > - } else { > - list_add(&mirror->list, &mirror->hmm->mirrors); > - up_write(&mirror->hmm->mirrors_sem); > - } > + list_add(&mirror->list, &mirror->hmm->mirrors); > + up_write(&mirror->hmm->mirrors_sem); > > return 0; > } > @@ -273,33 +307,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_mirror_register); > */ > void hmm_mirror_unregister(struct hmm_mirror *mirror) > { > - bool should_unregister = false; > - struct mm_struct *mm; > - struct hmm *hmm; > + struct hmm *hmm = READ_ONCE(mirror->hmm); > > - if (mirror->hmm == NULL) > + if (hmm == NULL) > return; > > - hmm = mirror->hmm; > down_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem); > list_del_init(&mirror->list); > - should_unregister = list_empty(&hmm->mirrors); > + /* To protect us against double unregister ... */ > mirror->hmm = NULL; > - mm = hmm->mm; > - hmm->mm = NULL; > up_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem); > > - if (!should_unregister || mm == NULL) > - return; > - > - mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release(&hmm->mmu_notifier, mm); > - > - spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock); > - if (mm->hmm == hmm) > - mm->hmm = NULL; > - spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock); > - > - kfree(hmm); > + hmm_put(hmm); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_mirror_unregister); > > @@ -708,6 +727,8 @@ int hmm_vma_get_pfns(struct hmm_range *range) > struct mm_walk mm_walk; > struct hmm *hmm; > > + range->hmm = NULL; > + > /* Sanity check, this really should not happen ! */ > if (range->start < vma->vm_start || range->start >= vma->vm_end) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -717,14 +738,18 @@ int hmm_vma_get_pfns(struct hmm_range *range) > hmm = hmm_register(vma->vm_mm); > if (!hmm) > return -ENOMEM; > - /* Caller must have registered a mirror, via hmm_mirror_register() ! */ > - if (!hmm->mmu_notifier.ops) > + > + /* Check if hmm_mm_destroy() was call. */ > + if (hmm->mm == NULL) { > + hmm_put(hmm); > return -EINVAL; > + } > > /* FIXME support hugetlb fs */ > if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_SPECIAL) || > vma_is_dax(vma)) { > hmm_pfns_special(range); > + hmm_put(hmm); > return -EINVAL; > } > > @@ -736,6 +761,7 @@ int hmm_vma_get_pfns(struct hmm_range *range) > * operations such has atomic access would not work. > */ > hmm_pfns_clear(range, range->pfns, range->start, range->end); > + hmm_put(hmm); > return -EPERM; > } > > @@ -758,6 +784,12 @@ int hmm_vma_get_pfns(struct hmm_range *range) > mm_walk.pte_hole = hmm_vma_walk_hole; > > walk_page_range(range->start, range->end, &mm_walk); > + /* > + * Transfer hmm reference to the range struct it will be drop inside > + * the hmm_vma_range_done() function (which _must_ be call if this > + * function return 0). > + */ > + range->hmm = hmm; > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_vma_get_pfns); > @@ -802,25 +834,27 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_vma_get_pfns); > */ > bool hmm_vma_range_done(struct hmm_range *range) > { > - unsigned long npages = (range->end - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > - struct hmm *hmm; > + bool ret = false; > > - if (range->end <= range->start) { > + /* Sanity check this really should not happen. */ > + if (range->hmm == NULL || range->end <= range->start) { > BUG(); > return false; > } > > - hmm = hmm_register(range->vma->vm_mm); > - if (!hmm) { > - memset(range->pfns, 0, sizeof(*range->pfns) * npages); > - return false; > - } > - > - spin_lock(&hmm->lock); > + spin_lock(&range->hmm->lock); > list_del_rcu(&range->list); > - spin_unlock(&hmm->lock); > + ret = range->valid; > + spin_unlock(&range->hmm->lock); > > - return range->valid; > + /* Is the mm still alive ? */ > + if (range->hmm->mm == NULL) > + ret = false; > + > + /* Drop reference taken by hmm_vma_fault() or hmm_vma_get_pfns() */ > + hmm_put(range->hmm); > + range->hmm = NULL; > + return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_vma_range_done); > > @@ -880,6 +914,8 @@ int hmm_vma_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool block) > struct hmm *hmm; > int ret; > > + range->hmm = NULL; > + > /* Sanity check, this really should not happen ! */ > if (range->start < vma->vm_start || range->start >= vma->vm_end) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -891,14 +927,18 @@ int hmm_vma_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool block) > hmm_pfns_clear(range, range->pfns, range->start, range->end); > return -ENOMEM; > } > - /* Caller must have registered a mirror using hmm_mirror_register() */ > - if (!hmm->mmu_notifier.ops) > + > + /* Check if hmm_mm_destroy() was call. */ > + if (hmm->mm == NULL) { > + hmm_put(hmm); > return -EINVAL; > + } > > /* FIXME support hugetlb fs */ > if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_SPECIAL) || > vma_is_dax(vma)) { > hmm_pfns_special(range); > + hmm_put(hmm); > return -EINVAL; > } > > @@ -910,6 +950,7 @@ int hmm_vma_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool block) > * operations such has atomic access would not work. > */ > hmm_pfns_clear(range, range->pfns, range->start, range->end); > + hmm_put(hmm); > return -EPERM; > } > > @@ -945,7 +986,16 @@ int hmm_vma_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool block) > hmm_pfns_clear(range, &range->pfns[i], hmm_vma_walk.last, > range->end); > hmm_vma_range_done(range); > + hmm_put(hmm); > + } else { > + /* > + * Transfer hmm reference to the range struct it will be drop > + * inside the hmm_vma_range_done() function (which _must_ be > + * call if this function return 0). > + */ > + range->hmm = hmm; > } > + > return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_vma_fault); > -- > 2.17.2 >