Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
        "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: da9063: remove platform_data
Thread-Topic: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: da9063: remove platform_data
Thread-Index: AQHU3aIiRxuJGE6LNESZwBdNcQFfU6YigYOw
Date:   Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:02:25 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1PR10MB235256E1840C1E594ECDC0A5FE5A0@VI1PR10MB2352.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <20190318154759.21978-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190318154759.21978-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [193.240.73.196]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: dc746189-7b21-43c0-2e9d-08d6b43606ea
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600127)(711020)(4605104)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020);SRVR:VI1PR10MB0512;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR10MB0512:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR10MB05127C1C9C9B74A326412BF9F55A0@VI1PR10MB0512.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-forefront-prvs: 0991CAB7B3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(346002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(396003)(199004)(189003)(8936002)(186003)(256004)(86362001)(2501003)(68736007)(71190400001)(52536014)(305945005)(3846002)(6116002)(71200400001)(66066001)(7736002)(53546011)(6506007)(55016002)(11346002)(229853002)(316002)(478600001)(486006)(476003)(14454004)(33656002)(76176011)(446003)(106356001)(7696005)(54906003)(53936002)(2906002)(110136005)(105586002)(8676002)(6436002)(4326008)(81166006)(97736004)(81156014)(26005)(5660300002)(99286004)(25786009)(6246003)(102836004)(9686003)(74316002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:VI1PR10MB0512;H:VI1PR10MB2352.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:0;MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: diasemi.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AxLJAZhJDqFANLcolnLuqT5RCIaZ9oV5BRkKt2SHy6p2CAQWWSfZkkpUbnwrVT/pqWLRFixmrWh5OQFOzDyZ2ZOKf08kolvhxseqLhZ9nNMZo/Xdnl7Il6fdCZkMu5JqyIpHioOQGjr+dvZv7VpM+u1q9RAet5Aicg34Pt1Ys8O4SY04KtNNkGjkQK+bmlzwIVO8nSct7dDVW8dOFOjGhsZLIOn9MG+EbOUGdAqUIlQ2xozurV5YS1EXtDih5PBNHE4swie+yeNmxlp9IrbUY5irOIAysiNunif+czXb4kxjbhKm/7Oye3h99YEHOuzMFbwXfwuo+XwRQEMrNpNK2sQl6X2CTNYXztr64wnWRnn3N6Ht7jWBOGhTyviXgXAOeeMkMXaLeZKk6XZNjgpmIuLAsmIpvCHkM3D831ZbO78=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: diasemi.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: dc746189-7b21-43c0-2e9d-08d6b43606ea
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Mar 2019 11:02:25.5427
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 511e3c0e-ee96-486e-a2ec-e272ffa37b7c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR10MB0512
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On 18 March 2019 15:48 Wolfram Sang wrote:

> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: da9063: remove platform_data
>=20
> When working with this driver while debugging something else, I noticed t=
hat
> there are no in-kernel users of platform_data anymore. Removing the suppo=
rt
> simplifies the code and gets rid of quite some lines. The biggest refacto=
ring
> went to the regulator driver which could maybe benefit from more
> refactorization. However, there is no in-kernel user of that driver, so n=
o
> testing. I left it at this stage. I think the changes are still at a leve=
l
> where review and build-testing will give enough confidence.
>=20
> Besides the regulator thing, it was tested on a Renesas Lager board (R-Ca=
r H2).
> No regressions encountered. buildbot was happy, too.
>=20
> The patches are based on v5.1-rc1. I'd vote for all of them going through=
 the
> MFD tree. Looking forward to comments!
>=20
>    Wolfram

I've acked-by and tested-by for all the patches now. Apologies because it t=
ook
such a long time to get around to looking at this.

(For my benefit) I regression tested against v5.0 and v5.1-rc1, ok.

Thanks,
Steve