Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 08:37:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 08:37:15 -0500 Received: from humbolt.geo.uu.nl ([131.211.28.48]:19216 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 08:37:04 -0500 Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 14:36:43 +0100 (CET) From: Rik van Riel To: Christoph Rohland cc: Jonathan George , "'matthew@mattshouse.com'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: 2.4.0-test10 Sluggish After Load In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4 Nov 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote: > Rik van Riel writes: > > Indeed, shared memory performance still sucks rocks. > > No, it's not a performance problem. It is a hard lockup problem on > highmem machines. > > I do see two problems here: > 1) shm_swap_core does not handle the failure of prepare_higmem_swapout > right and basically cannot do so. It gets called zone independant > and should probably get called per zone. At least it has to react: AFAIC try_to_swap_out can handle this situation fine, it shouldn't be very difficult to get shm_swap to handle it too... Unfortunately I don't have a really big memory machine so I cannot test this stuff :( > You see: you only have 5+27+27=59 pages under your control... Ughhhh. Maybe we need some rebalancing there as well. That's a maximum of 5 pages of executable text mapped into all processes... regards, Rik -- The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network of people. That is its real strength. http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/