Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 21:25:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 21:24:53 -0400 Received: from mailout00.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.16]:7946 "EHLO mailout00.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 21:24:42 -0400 Message-ID: <3ACBC91B.8224A379@baldauf.org> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 03:23:39 +0200 From: Xuan Baldauf X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: de-DE,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Nicholas Petreley , Harald Dunkel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ReiserFS? How reliable is it? Is this the future? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > This is a reiserfs security issue, but only of theoretical nature (Even i= > > f > > triggered, it won't harm you). But the reason for this bug is in NFS (v2,= > > If the blocks contained my old /etc/shadow I'd be a bit upset. The only bad consequence possible is that you possibly cannot create a file with a given filename if someone else (remote user) could create at least 127 files with a very special filename within the same directory. Usually, /etc/shadow and all other important files either are created before any other user has access or (if they are created later) belong to directories where only root may create files in it. > > > > displacement instead of vertical displacement) is planned. > > > > I can tell you more if you want. > > I trust Chris to keep it in order. I've not yet had a broken patch from them > for -ac :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/