Message-ID: <1080539253.cbd988577d080@system.cs.fsu.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:47:33 -0500
From: khandelw@cs.fsu.edu
To: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nbd-server?
References: <20040329053939.GO21875@rdlg.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040329053939.GO21875@rdlg.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1025
Lines: 29

Some of my friends were fiddling around with it some time back. AFAIR enbd
-server is a user level process were as nbd was in the kernel.

Quoting "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>:

>
>
>   I'm looking at messing with network block devices and found 2 "servers"
> in the debian unstable tree.  "nbd-server" and "enbd" (enhanced network
> block device support).  Is either one better than the other?
>
> :wq!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
>                                          @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
> DISCLAIMER:
>       These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.
>
> With Dreams To Be A King First One Should Be A Man
> 					- Manowar
>
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/