Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262720AbUC2HQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:16:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262721AbUC2HQn (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:16:43 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:28060 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262720AbUC2HQn (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:16:43 -0500 To: "Robert L. Harris" Cc: Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: nbd-server? References: <20040329053939.GO21875@rdlg.net> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 29 Mar 2004 00:15:56 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20040329053939.GO21875@rdlg.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 629 Lines: 10 "Robert L. Harris" writes: > I'm looking at messing with network block devices and found 2 "servers" > in the debian unstable tree. "nbd-server" and "enbd" (enhanced network > block device support). Is either one better than the other? nbd is simple and works. I have managed to at least oops both enbd and drbd. They have more features but... Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/