Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:44:21 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
       linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] speed up SATA
Message-ID: <20040329124421.GB24370@suse.de>
References: <20040328141014.GE24370@suse.de> <40670BD9.9020707@pobox.com> <20040328173508.GI24370@suse.de> <40670FDB.6080409@pobox.com> <20040328175436.GL24370@suse.de> <20040328180809.GB1087@mail.shareable.org> <20040328181502.GO24370@suse.de> <40671FAF.6080501@pobox.com> <20040329080943.GR24370@suse.de> <20040329124147.GC4984@mail.shareable.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040329124147.GC4984@mail.shareable.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 785
Lines: 21

On Mon, Mar 29 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Could be used to limit tcq depth, not just request sizes solving two
> > problems at once. I already have a tiny bit of keeping this
> > accounting to do proper unplugs (right now it just looks at missing
> > requests from the pool, doesn't work on tcq).
> 
> Does it make sense to allow different numbers of outstanding TCQ-reads
> and TCQ-writes?

Might not be a silly thing to experiment with, definitely something that
should be tested (added to list...)

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/