Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262876AbUC2OV6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:21:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262882AbUC2OV5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:21:57 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:22670 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262876AbUC2OVz (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:21:55 -0500 Subject: Re: Very poor performance with 2.6.4 From: Chris Mason To: Andreas Hartmann Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4067BF2C.8050801@p3EE060D4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> References: <40672F39.5040702@p3EE062D5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> <20040328200710.66a4ae1a.akpm@osdl.org> <4067BF2C.8050801@p3EE060D4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1080570227.20685.93.camel@watt.suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:23:48 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1661 Lines: 45 On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 01:16, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Andreas Hartmann wrote: > >> > >> I tested kernel 2.6.4. While compiling kdelibs and kdebase, I felt, that > >> kernel 2.6 seems to be slower than 2.4.25. > >> > >> So I did some tests to compare the performance directly. Therefore I > >> rebooted for everey test in init 2 (no X). > >> > >> I locally compiled 2.6.5rc2 3 times under 2.6.4 and under 2.4.25 on a > >> reiserfs LVM partition, which resides onto a IDE HD (using DMA) and got > >> the following result: > >> > >> In the middle, compiling under kernel 2.6.4 tooks 9.3% more real time than > >> under 2.4.25. > >> The user-processortime is about the same, but the system-processortime is > >> under 2.6.4 32.9% higher than under 2.4.25. > > > > Try mounting your reiserfs filesystems with the `-o nolargeio=1' option. > > This didn't help. > > > > > If that doesn't help, please run a comparative kernel profile. See > > Documentation/basic_profiling.txt. > > I'll do this next. You might also want to try 2.6.5-rc2 which has a set of reiserfs fixes from 2.4.x. I'm hoping those will clean things up for you. 2.6.5-rc2-mm3 and higher have a number of other reiserfs performance fixes, but most of those were not in 2.4. Trying them out will complicate the picture (although I'm still interested in numbers from -mm). -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/