Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262892AbUC2OuR (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:50:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262904AbUC2OuR (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:50:17 -0500 Received: from nefty.hu ([195.70.37.175]:9627 "EHLO nefty.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262892AbUC2OuN (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:50:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:50:02 +0200 From: Zoltan NAGY X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.04.7) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: Zoltan NAGY Organization: Nefty Informatics X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1067885681.20040329165002@nefty.hu> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: pdflush and dm-crypt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 832 Lines: 24 Hi! I've just upgraded the system to 2.6.5-rc2-bk6, and I'm using dm-crypt. It's a heavily used server, on average 20-30mbit/sec traffic is on the wire 7/24, and just noticed, that the load is very high. In every 4-5 sec pdflush takes a lot of cpu... Is this intentional? I've found a similar question on kerneltrap (http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/2756), but havent found a solution yet. I'm just wondering if it is a problem, or it's the normal behavior? It's a 1.8 P4 with 1G ram and highmem enabled, with 256 bit aes thru dm-crypt. Regards, -- Zoltan NAGY, Network Administrator - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/