Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262918AbUC2PCV (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:02:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262932AbUC2PCV (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:02:21 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:51665 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262918AbUC2PBk (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:01:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:01:38 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Zoltan NAGY Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pdflush and dm-crypt Message-ID: <20040329150137.GH24370@suse.de> References: <1067885681.20040329165002@nefty.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1067885681.20040329165002@nefty.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 952 Lines: 24 On Mon, Mar 29 2004, Zoltan NAGY wrote: > Hi! > > I've just upgraded the system to 2.6.5-rc2-bk6, and I'm using > dm-crypt. It's a heavily used server, on average 20-30mbit/sec > traffic is on the wire 7/24, and just noticed, that the load is very > high. In every 4-5 sec pdflush takes a lot of cpu... Is this > intentional? I've found a similar question on kerneltrap > (http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/2756), but havent found a solution > yet. I'm just wondering if it is a problem, or it's the normal > behavior? It's a 1.8 P4 with 1G ram and highmem enabled, with 256 bit > aes thru dm-crypt. Try the -mm kernels intead, should have lots better behaviour for pdflush/dm interactions. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/