Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190321101557.26857-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
 <20190401084143.uqbiktkt2vltgrxa@ninjato> <CAMuHMdW_Gz4qaRXFeW-h7vNxJ5RwjDXDP4oZZcUaYHcqEC75bA@mail.gmail.com>
 <VI1PR10MB235254A7A95F4045A5410D1EFE550@VI1PR10MB2352.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR10MB235254A7A95F4045A5410D1EFE550@VI1PR10MB2352.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:42:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVsp86n_1+c6NZpCG1MwcAzEH7rgaESHfYESb5YcLk6zw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
To:     Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        "linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Steve,

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:39 PM Steve Twiss
<stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com> wrote:
> On 01 April 2019 10:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:43 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:15:56AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > The DA9062 and DA9063 have a year register that can go up to 0x3F.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > >
> > > I couldn't test the upper limit (DA9063 hooked to a 32bit system here),
> > > but lower limit works and RTC in general works.
> >
> > BTW, does the RTC alarm interrupt work for you?
>
> As far as I can tell, there are no RTC alarm regressions.
>
> I am using an i.MX6Q board and with an unmodified v5.1-rc1 kernel, for the
> alarms, I see everything working okay WITHOUT Alexandre's patches ...

Thanks!

I was just wondering whether they work for Wolfram, who has a similar
but different board than I have. Last time I tried, they didn't work for me.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds