Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp376236yba; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:08:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCQ77YJ+yAdJ52RKHth537vXSRLxtC5vqSkPQyn2tRu5bR77RM6dTTXdJPTuoDAyjjR+I6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2aca:: with SMTP id j68mr17858152plb.233.1554131300423; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 08:08:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554131300; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OhE2MF29vIsNBiKp4YCWtLiy+WdHkv7MS9dySdFXotdHsgOUvPP/WIEwiQcMS6sjNN UreewVtozP2hmCmH6KOwIN8TG18Lr4ZjmyvZ7JleR/bG9IKiwICcsdg7nSb74IzwshMe UmmMu3GSXaZlXIqKFDbf1Rz4TsTL04pcB7ntNstyVLkoH4Khai2Y6GiJUC6aF2S5YODA ODzTpUE+w9lw+OMFc/wvYISkb54lO/HBjWFfrLGxhl7FpUPcrVoeJuprQiBfHBghZKMW IFfWpxqgvZ3sIVEwHwAoNosPVqjXPmMJEE+UGg/QWe9ynHIJdTGJVLfMJyhCmVuTYbkA Yw5A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=5zq1rrYiMkcun9lnmUSrP34rUlYpHSgZnJEkget+Z9E=; b=AniIzAZ2VQfdilBFe+y5kQ4Dc9RWSz9YMPjzgkIJi9K9ThX9CZScrfdd1iIw6QLA0+ atEjVI11US5gArjvuHIfGVVCryHJ617QQgwHgo70KKkmzOVA901aGz2/ut6elE31+BZx 1/RmLc0svKxuTOay7HrZUGgGXzDcmQkzPsQszl99xXgvHxGICXX2I0Z/ZL6WB/pLzimJ euSX1hUAx/HuJJC5bpSo2ZQbJ/cM44qbJVGZ2O1oeYNMxhW6AFsxQDg2XAb/BVBzD1Fc IrcbhOaH38YjoLTm7kEIGPVc5SDoximUEyoevq7XyDzC4qmoAIwlqBIXEsMEC6pAUI0M 6txg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f12si9451914pfh.257.2019.04.01.08.08.03; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 08:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726968AbfDAPHY (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:07:24 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50010 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726617AbfDAPHX (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:07:23 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF20AF4C; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1554131240.6965.5.camel@suse.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: isch: Remove unnecessary acpi.h include From: Jean Delvare To: Bjorn Helgaas , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-i2c , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mukesh Ojha , Wolfram Sang Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 17:07:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20190325183652.252175-1-helgaas@kernel.org> Organization: Suse Linux Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 08:50 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:37 PM wrote: > > > > From: Bjorn Helgaas > > > > 54fb4a05af0a ("i2c: Check for ACPI resource conflicts") included > > so we could use acpi_check_region(). fd46a0064af1 ("i2c: > > convert i2c-isch to platform_device") removed the use of > > acpi_check_region() but not the include. > > > > Remove the now-unnecessary include of . No functional change > > intended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas > > Added > > Fixes: fd46a0064af1 ("i2c: convert i2c-isch to platform_device") > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare > Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha > > on my local branch. > > Jean, would you like me to repost this with the updates? I assume you > will merge this (just based on get_maintainer.pl)? No, Wolfram prefers to pick all the i2c patches into his own branch, I'm only giving my Reviewed-by. So your question is for him. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support