Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp385164yba; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:17:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygT97cHKBU7cGFo8rrv7qUtwBpPSoLnU4BvsbzmZSbPj27FGc6sNyIGlY6Wu8I0hX8IdyJ X-Received: by 2002:a63:7808:: with SMTP id t8mr28503713pgc.127.1554131848519; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 08:17:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554131848; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xTa+sAPop0QY09nK2uF6eY8Q6RB21YX9NbLWkn42zJNSV2gRm2jbyY3YjhjOntFQHj g2h2v050VwGRzzIJl0uMlHfni46Ca2HHvErckPWEj5fdJwYHBc8iqpHmndgIMe5hGnu4 aaC5ml1ZjR8yldwcgtbSZpRT/kzX03AWzcsU69EIYYpDt5ClAwOTE9P12blv1Yl3eWWN wPYVviuisGJ7l/A7ca36XVMK7E3+pd9QpzYUME+8fpGSd+rodF0y2keqcLIW26+AunlQ r229LUfIclMmsofwI4XiPPODi/Pfv0sS8rtwYjRqP4mYbqWfALrfbb4ifiwB6KspCxbQ U/eg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=IfL5acYbz0Iw7pYAfgolLG11XW1i7q+aRkezqLRM+Gc=; b=cG3+ZrTwbtmz728c4Hj2mEVG13ovY+s1t4hLrQN8jhjzYC6bQzSsrZP3ajPU6NzMzG tFc53mkOinoK7bMxVsHFHFQEzHNMCtTuGj4HpnMGXnhFoEtECCuLNh36LiGAkfSxYAY/ JGUBifsBu6PS2JYTikthh1I92/BLTqqajMZVOOeqfc8lyPksDJ0ZIfEs1QPnxQH+cHxV tyMV3il1kPhD50zPBolunIHLJbliEgx7p7ZLtjUIPm7BM089+Yumm+Yauy9qegmod6nP zdetwYjQTYRfdtd6CKpcFiGJaVMutm1RVwd0Xae8Eb5IpEiqWu9Y0Savzbg+9WKaNMwA jnvQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e124si8660067pfc.80.2019.04.01.08.17.13; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 08:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728553AbfDAPQd (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:16:33 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:54043 "EHLO relay7-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726637AbfDAPQc (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:16:32 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 109.213.83.19 Received: from localhost (alyon-652-1-60-19.w109-213.abo.wanadoo.fr [109.213.83.19]) (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DDCA2000F; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:16:28 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Steve Twiss , "linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Wolfram Sang , Support Opensource , Linux-Renesas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range Message-ID: <20190401151628.GK3430@piout.net> References: <20190321101557.26857-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> <20190401084143.uqbiktkt2vltgrxa@ninjato> <20190401132109.GA4570@kunai> <20190401150741.vwqzzngnma4jvkid@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190401150741.vwqzzngnma4jvkid@ninjato> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/04/2019 17:07:42+0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:39:43PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Wolfram, > > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 3:21 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > I was just wondering whether they work for Wolfram, who has a similar > > > > but different board than I have. Last time I tried, they didn't work for me. > > > > > > How did you test? > > > > tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c cfr. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdWbV2=LfSWz0rFTGRakZ=2iXKOYdM_Uwaov8-OsJpUgoA@mail.gmail.com/ > > Hmm, with vanilla v5.1-rc3, I don't even get that far: > > [==========] Running 7 tests from 2 test cases. > [ RUN ] rtc.date_read > rtctest.c:49:rtc.date_read:Current RTC date/time is 01/01/2000 04:06:40. > [ OK ] rtc.date_read > [ RUN ] rtc.uie_read > > And here it blocks forever. Any pointers? > This means that you don't get any interrupt from your RTC (and that I have to fix the timeout for uie_read). -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com