Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262525AbUC2VJM (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:09:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262538AbUC2VJM (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:09:12 -0500 Received: from dsl081-235-061.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.235.61]:4005 "EHLO ground0.sonous.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262525AbUC2VJJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:09:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1080594005.3570.12.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> References: <5516F046-81C1-11D8-A0A8-000A959DCC8C@sonous.com> <1080594005.3570.12.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <50DC82B4-81C5-11D8-A0A8-000A959DCC8C@sonous.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lev Lvovsky Subject: Re: older kernels + new glibc? Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:09:07 -0800 To: arjanv@redhat.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 791 Lines: 23 We have the source of the drivers, but they are specific to the 2.2.x kernels. I am not a kernel hacker, and this would be way beyond my area of expertise. And sadly, this doesn't answer the initial question. -lev On Mar 29, 2004, at 1:00 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >> Specifically, a piece of telecom hardware that we use out in the field >> requires a 2.2.x kernel to compile the drivers, however, after >> choosing > > you could of course ask/use the source of the driver and port it to > 2.4... that's what open source is about ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/