Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp525438yba; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyr1/9+2/aXfHJrS8X65npq1fbQenmZfT74JCghXhttv8QH5uOR60ZLjKVBKBpTDDe6ztKl X-Received: by 2002:a62:7590:: with SMTP id q138mr21148978pfc.74.1554141844255; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554141844; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZmD6ay6nsRUFpM2vEq+WyEKGhA1ElW7gpmDBabwnj1D6aZlvbOnvaZVSkKR5s0Lelm Pfuz3CvYj2FPw34YxpRxQc+XOZIfw5obAq/VxbY4PVwA1jXVwAEFEls9ghzMdwFQ2C8H 1OG3LQJVmnz+aloaUMNbItHmHwHXlIw0SRVcApHzcOQppBkp09nonHBqo0vo88QpFBN0 MFR7yuA6f0HQZcmFhy3osGeqjJoxcKIwu+FjdMFOXgu6nYRifT14Zg4Jz0WxndY9m7cW HpHouh92HIzA1XvKDaOvvGCoM6lxJ4E1XMzNHBn0JVm/OzPIMZETTwWNJnYAqmD9Ll1P BCew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:accept-language:references:message-id:date :thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=FgqPjPpDhqbG5l/VJZh6afGVq3rpqo7KWFSeI8Ptj0s=; b=n2OGr7FEV2gvTGQu3bSGZfwzUG07Oglzn1VePicmco513gYJS3ammZn+pqoycqgoLZ qegOMQzNK1imkWGP8lcHeushWR2h14FzJpK7A73MJPHlf/lPmYOBkPjMEm6Ms8UH/xmK oD3LJNyuL6tmJ79a36vvyeWx3hcPzc9gkdUg0UYRKQEXEgS81OKtoqB8QkS54JnWKVKZ ieiTdl3MjeMxLp7ONbHgKMV/z6hAnwyZT+l6SyvlUPFFtoSDqKMkewr2LTlardKARnom FEw7jJKUv0oM1s64gCSLtuRb/ycvbVCuQ3KrLAd8If2vMZkdlUTkgEUJmtrmV20sMx/e L0lg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@synopsys.com header.s=mail header.b=YoTDLpmG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=synopsys.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 140si9179014pga.460.2019.04.01.11.03.48; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@synopsys.com header.s=mail header.b=YoTDLpmG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=synopsys.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731096AbfDASB7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:01:59 -0400 Received: from smtprelay.synopsys.com ([198.182.47.9]:55172 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730771AbfDASB6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:01:58 -0400 Received: from mailhost.synopsys.com (dc8-mailhost1.synopsys.com [10.13.135.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtprelay.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC2E24E2A84; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:01:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1554141717; bh=FgqPjPpDhqbG5l/VJZh6afGVq3rpqo7KWFSeI8Ptj0s=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:From; b=YoTDLpmGmrCQjVP058/3XGBm1mQDyEBxMSuIKB7BMjzaFMWK5T/UpEL3eBs6+AM6/ lwM4MXqFVDYMvwIbnl2mXdk64+ZlMhgtWYUkUTM4SmlR+2gAgT4hCBBOdfbdXc9dNh 5Ta3xLONrvGKtziBPclvaBjzyi3jCjTF70XAOaXkCH8je/UcVdbc77158VG7wYok4l IvEauSohdT9WS+AZk+XZ8H3GiQIzn65f1b3HhD00FEEJ7VmPrLILaFUztc1baoYlcs ErqzitFudAmKWMTq+4UUeFnLmdjj9ZZ4RJg9+6RnKtxKXxi91LTvY58vRCd8eCrzeP +7nVCtnOcHYeg== Received: from US01WXQAHTC1.internal.synopsys.com (us01wxqahtc1.internal.synopsys.com [10.12.238.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhost.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44043A005A; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 18:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from US01WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com ([fe80::e4b6:5520:9c0d:250b]) by US01WXQAHTC1.internal.synopsys.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:01:51 -0700 From: Vineet Gupta To: David Laight , "'gregkh@linuxfoundation.org'" , Andrey Abramov CC: George Spelvin , "adrian.hunter@intel.com" , "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" , "benh@kernel.crashing.org" , "bp@alien8.de" , "darrick.wong@oracle.com" , "dchinner@redhat.com" , "dedekind1@gmail.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "jlbec@evilplan.org" , "jpoimboe@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" , "mark@fasheh.com" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "mpe@ellerman.id.au" , "naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "paulus@samba.org" , "richard@nod.at" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "vgupta@synopsys.com" , "x86@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Lib: sort.h: replace int size with size_t size in the swap function Thread-Topic: [PATCH 5/5] Lib: sort.h: replace int size with size_t size in the swap function Thread-Index: AQHU6JnBsi9jfaw2oEibJh5UEx7dnA== Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 18:01:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <18626931553963861@sas1-b3ec53dbc12b.qloud-c.yandex.net> <20467491553964233@myt4-c0b480c282c8.qloud-c.yandex.net> <20190330183826.GB21828@kroah.com> <201903302015.x2UKFnSL003850@sdf.org> <20434561554015618@myt1-cd60b8ae9bb9.qloud-c.yandex.net> <20190331105412.GA9393@kroah.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.144.199.106] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/1/19 7:46 AM, David Laight wrote:=0A= > From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org=0A= >> Sent: 31 March 2019 11:54=0A= > ...=0A= >> Yes, "int" is a very nice variable for "size", you need to explain why= =0A= >> it is better to use size_t here please.=0A= > Actually, on x86_64 you probably want 'unsigned int' to avoid the=0A= > compiler having to generate a sign-extending register move if the=0A= > value is ever used in a 64bit expression (eg an address calculation).=0A= =0A= Thats likely true for non x86 arches too (for certain on ARC). That is also= the=0A= reason I dislike "bool", despite its "software engineering" benefits. Per A= RC ABI=0A= (and likely others too) it is signed 8 bits and any use thereof, requires t= he=0A= compiler to generate an additional EXTB instruction to promote to 32-bit in= t with=0A= sign extension before using the value.=0A= =0A= -Vineet=0A=