Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263184AbUC2XwV (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 18:52:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263191AbUC2XwV (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 18:52:21 -0500 Received: from smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.169.223]:50296 "HELO smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263184AbUC2XwT (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 18:52:19 -0500 Message-ID: <4068B692.9020307@yahoo.com.au> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:51:46 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Ingo Molnar , jun.nakajima@intel.com, ricklind@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, kernel@kolivas.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, anton@samba.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, mbligh@aracnet.com Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3 References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D372001730111990F@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com> <20040325154011.GB30175@wotan.suse.de> <20040325190944.GB12383@elte.hu> <20040325162121.5942df4f.ak@suse.de> <20040325193913.GA14024@elte.hu> <20040325203032.GA15663@elte.hu> <20040329084531.GB29458@wotan.suse.de> <4068066C.507@yahoo.com.au> <20040329080150.4b8fd8ef.ak@suse.de> <20040329114635.GA30093@elte.hu> <20040329221434.4602e062.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20040329221434.4602e062.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1012 Lines: 31 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:46:35 +0200 > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > >>* Andi Kleen wrote: >> >> >>>Sorry ignore this report - I just found out I booted the wrong kernel >>>by mistake. Currently retesting, also with the proposed change to only >>>use a single scheduling domain. >> >>here are the items that are in the works: >> >> redhat.com/~mingo/scheduler-patches/sched.patch >> >>it's against 2.6.5-rc2-mm5. This patch also reduces the rate of active >>balancing a bit. > > > I applied only this patch and it did slightly better than the normal -mm* > 1.5 - 2x CPU bandwidth, but still very short of the 3.7x-4x mainline > and 2.4 reach. So both -mm5 and Ingo's sched.patch are much worse than what 2.4 and 2.6 get? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/