Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:03:19 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc:     tglx@linutronix.de, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com,
        alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] locking/static_key: improve rate limited labels
Message-ID: <20190402070319.GF12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20190330000854.30142-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
 <20190401112153.2f9e87ba@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190401112153.2f9e87ba@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:21:53AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 17:08:51 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > This will be used to fix the static branch disabling in the TLS
> > code.  The net/tls/ code should be using the deferred static
> > branch type, because unprivileged users can flip the branch
> > on and off quite easily with CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE=y.
> > 
> > Second of all we shouldn't take the jump label locks from
> > the RX path, when the socket is destroyed.  This can be avoided
> > with some slight code refactoring in deferred static_key as
> > it already runs from a workqueue.
> > 
> > This the series (and a simple tls patch which makes use of it)
> > applied opening 0.5M TLS connections to localhost (just calling
> > setsockopt, no data exchange) goes down from 37.9s to 12.4s.
> 
> Once/if we get positive feedback from locking folks, would it be
> possible to merge these via net-next tree alongside the patch
> converting TLS to rate limited branches?

Sorry, I've been ill, I'll try and have a look at these patches soon.