Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1316770yba; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 06:45:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzKmvbir/UICIFj0BrYfIQtJKxIjF0YPueszP0Z6mJKl/iDRF05RPvmDSENs/D+6UQluXkR X-Received: by 2002:a63:7444:: with SMTP id e4mr48697600pgn.261.1554212738689; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 06:45:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554212738; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WKsYuPV5QKRHgTxQDbBoI5eOLm4fPmK+DoP2fbq45x6luHC6c4hzUTPidsgWjhNsAy jJJp8zn3PCyXXJqImWYHFCbPoGs2L0iTgzqRynVTGVFqwZyAjrU1JaPqUCUu+nihss+C 8FzWIGcyeL+z3169wBiNrj4Z58EMZPL2misukFJLbUb6N4PH99oUW853pAN0kw+dzJn+ KylHaArOTSqbiyRSrFOKyjBxSk4i43OnCiblG7/euMJVBvyCQcvvcjH9K8bTz9wOCirH 46cHu7omGlKHYkMM8c8EzsRc5aUrZzU468n/Xpu2UR9Pm3NGUZJGK/Ld+FRzZStn69Nv O0bA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:subject:message-id:date:cc:to :from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=e0VYjmsONL17Cp8A6piXMAE/2FP3/pcIA/Q3Yb8vSDg=; b=MuBnRN0jEk3vDJdb9RXoWeXnVqH31WMocWYvA/K3oWqn5nppaJ31OPaoiUNeeJKnXC iNrWtedk8i+f8pCfCO06MXiAkjLfOoQVvtr8/6RFwOnj35t/zvqc7F+53XnDW144ad66 e8xGIejxCblmFht+9HmG99slokVYnOlo7qDY5RJZUBFcRhvIe+vMcG5eawZ4Ldn+HlY2 IJghq3Evt+nVQU9rMxOODIF4K778acMeKNTRi6JeycaAV5kxgzdgKBrUNlR+I0u5NQlF t6bgWX8azrmCmYRyEMBYvxbwZl4BlKAqXU9Ccy/8grhu/0dAvkvFbE4cQgq91qz6OQLh ZIJA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gn6si11494666plb.167.2019.04.02.06.45.22; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 06:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731991AbfDBNoI (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:44:08 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:43552 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731498AbfDBNkK (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:40:10 -0400 Received: from [167.98.27.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBJe3-0002nu-Nw; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:40:07 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hBJdy-0004y3-4z; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:40:02 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov , "Theodore Ts'o" , "Dan Carpenter" Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:38:28 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 94/99] ext4: fix special inode number checks in __ext4_iget() In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 167.98.27.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.65-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Theodore Ts'o commit 191ce17876c9367819c4b0a25b503c0f6d9054d8 upstream. The check for special (reserved) inode number checks in __ext4_iget() was broken by commit 8a363970d1dc: ("ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file handles"). This was caused by a botched reversal of the sense of the flag now known as EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL (when it was previously named EXT4_IGET_NORMAL). Fix the logic appropriately. Fixes: 8a363970d1dc ("ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent...") Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -4190,7 +4190,7 @@ struct inode *__ext4_iget(struct super_b uid_t i_uid; gid_t i_gid; - if (((flags & EXT4_IGET_NORMAL) && + if ((!(flags & EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL) && (ino < EXT4_FIRST_INO(sb) && ino != EXT4_ROOT_INO)) || (ino < EXT4_ROOT_INO) || (ino > le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count))) {