Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:34:50 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, jun.nakajima@intel.com, ricklind@us.ibm.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, kernel@kolivas.org,
       rusty@rustcorp.com.au, anton@samba.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
       mbligh@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups,
 sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3
Message-Id: <20040330083450.368eafc6.ak@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <4068B692.9020307@yahoo.com.au>
References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D372001730111990F@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com>
	<20040325154011.GB30175@wotan.suse.de>
	<20040325190944.GB12383@elte.hu>
	<20040325162121.5942df4f.ak@suse.de>
	<20040325193913.GA14024@elte.hu>
	<20040325203032.GA15663@elte.hu>
	<20040329084531.GB29458@wotan.suse.de>
	<4068066C.507@yahoo.com.au>
	<20040329080150.4b8fd8ef.ak@suse.de>
	<20040329114635.GA30093@elte.hu>
	<20040329221434.4602e062.ak@suse.de>
	<4068B692.9020307@yahoo.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 620
Lines: 21

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:51:46 +1000
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:


> So both -mm5 and Ingo's sched.patch are much worse than
> what 2.4 and 2.6 get?

Yes (2.6 vanilla and 2.4-aa at that, i haven't tested 2.4-vanilla) 

Ingo's sched.patch makes it a bit better (from 1x CPU to 1.5-1.7xCPU), but still
much worse than the max of 3.7x-4x CPU bandwidth.

-Andi


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/