Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1641789yba; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:51:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2GadwqmTqn4l0I6TUcerwFI54AAnXdJtjwsXpyOyQqiX/dMmidbPWbTaP1TwMoDw4UUUH X-Received: by 2002:a62:448d:: with SMTP id m13mr72343084pfi.182.1554234671234; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:51:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554234671; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l27MNOOQfbAvGdYGBN8NEsiAVyMZ1w0BnVJ2rJSl93cutF3KZOHT35ZYfnWZI3xxA9 1fXyYeAhF/Ku1ZJXCxG0BSEQqv4RCsKWrTbkXeXCmfUV0Kl7M+ld3HkT7N5JJZX2Z/00 xxHzpC33U4jdAOc1804qsp2Q5gdTi/9bzar0Oxl9eo95cFVxdH7lD7WNnnjzqOOjApSk YuY1G2VDx6RHu78GV7O+jALqyMiKkWeKCGdZhC0pFmb1YddO5/k3WmFAkjeVmvu3DnlT szqu1VNrRdGFoWaNDCcQiSldYfdjzdCfSHQVdU7Rs3rBOzD29HvQ7w+1Mxbk9Gh6+GAi nWbA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=sacUKmPYPzhBW/LsLb9Cr7OVhGJiX9hD7oXL+AdVHUA=; b=UOTAJxC9VK0+S23OlFWnYcViHMTAdzbT0O1dhPVfyen2P/CDyHULhfWRoVwY50thyw zO4Rf0/a2ALCsCqro/7EMD0iMu31hyt77Wo6gIkHRihcjp5y6lf9hjyRaTY0yb7FOIT/ l/+NZwHxAiwodgbttNmxu+kU1yt629hLKSl1dULASHi/3386MpNnPKOxwLQVZw0lv2aG mqkTHoBnARvb6vhLNptqJT9gr31RP/qf8qS/IiQSN7LY+tAxTqtdqqmsn0oo8y2f/gVs iEihlRv4NACqwXZLjbvxzIQUQwrrxhVD1b5dCKxxvj2Y1lUxT/bInauRH1IWtEcmWutL xliQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=N5P9FGFD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 195si11947138pga.312.2019.04.02.12.50.55; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=N5P9FGFD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730721AbfDBTVx (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:21:53 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55902 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726083AbfDBTVx (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:21:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [69.71.4.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA37F2082C; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:21:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1554232912; bh=mUJl9GjIhaTcalhVS05kGWKKcfEf8ElNfTEsbhSNwf8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=N5P9FGFDbpYMpH0GL+c0OZBKn1SUopqqVSdewo44BeykQt+Xfim3gkd/68GSCicA4 LHrMrlSZ5+U4Adrd580pEILaiU6UxooXfuC6ntkvxHfLTWTa/EhToOFuLUMPfBEJzg qqUdZmQu3iipUTjblYjs7YV7uBrj7aIhZYn+wRq4= Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:21:50 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Thierry Reding Cc: Vidya Sagar , mark.rutland@arm.com, heiko@sntech.de, hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com, maxime.ripard@bootlin.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, spujar@nvidia.com, will.deacon@arm.com, kthota@nvidia.com, mperttunen@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, stefan.wahren@i2se.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, krzk@kernel.org, kishon@ti.com, tiwai@suse.de, jagan@amarulasolutions.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, andy.gross@linaro.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr, liviu.dudau@arm.com, yue.wang@amlogic.com, enric.balletbo@collabora.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, horms+renesas@verge.net.au, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ezequiel@collabora.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, xiaowei.bao@nxp.com, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skomatineni@nvidia.com, jingoohan1@gmail.com, olof@lixom.net, tpiepho@impinj.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] dt-bindings: PCI: tegra: Add device tree support for T194 Message-ID: <20190402192150.GF141706@google.com> References: <1553613207-3988-1-git-send-email-vidyas@nvidia.com> <1553613207-3988-6-git-send-email-vidyas@nvidia.com> <20190328131508.GB5518@ulmo> <20190401150740.GB4874@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190401150740.GB4874@ulmo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:31:54PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > On 3/28/2019 6:45 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:43:22PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > > > Add support for Tegra194 PCIe controllers. These controllers are based > > > > on Synopsys DesignWare core IP. > > > > +- nvidia,disable-aspm-states : controls advertisement of ASPM states > > > > + bit-0 to '1' : disables advertisement of ASPM-L0s > > > > + bit-1 to '1' : disables advertisement of ASPM-L1. This also disables > > > > + advertisement of ASPM-L1.1 and ASPM-L1.2 > > > > + bit-2 to '1' : disables advertisement of ASPM-L1.1 > > > > + bit-3 to '1' : disables advertisement of ASPM-L1.2 > > > > > > These seem more like configuration options rather than hardware > > > description. > > Yes. Since the platforms like Jetson-Xavier based on T194 are going to go in > > open market, we are providing these configuration options and hence they are > > optional > > Under what circumstances would we want to disable certain ASPM states? > My understanding is that PCI device drivers can already disable > individual ASPM states if they don't support them, so why would we ever > want to disable advertisement of certain ASPM states? The PCI core (not individual device drivers) configures ASPM, and if both ends of the link implement the spec correctly, there is nothing the device driver needs to do. There *are* a few drivers that fiddle with ASPM-related things. I think this is because either the core isn't doing things correctly and we haven't bothered to fix the root cause, or the device itself is broken and we need to disable something the hardware claims to support. Bjorn