Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 05:16:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 05:16:37 -0400 Received: from [212.115.175.146] ([212.115.175.146]:38132 "EHLO ftrs1.intranet.FTR.NL") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 05:16:27 -0400 Message-ID: <27525795B28BD311B28D00500481B7601F1169@ftrs1.intranet.ftr.nl> From: "Heusden, Folkert van" To: manfred@colorfullife.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: random PIDs Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:15:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Finished & tested my random PID kernel/fork.c:get_pid() replacement. > > This one keeps track of the last N (default is 64) pids who have exited. > > These are then not used. So, one cannot have more then 32767 - (64 + 1 > > (init) + 1 (idle)) = 32761 processes :o) > DW> Huh, should be 32701, right?! > You're absolutely right. It must've been the victory trance :o) M> Have you actually tried to create lots of threads? No M> IIRC get_pid will loop forever if it doesn't find a free pid, and in the M> worst case you can trigger that with ~11000 running threads. Ah, ok. But why would you have 11.000 running threads? M> And the current code can create multiple threads with the same pid (I M> never tried to trigger that bug, but it seems to be possible) mine will do that too: if (flags & CLONE_PID) return current->pid; As far as my knowledge reaches, threads are cloned which triggers the code I quoted above. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/